LOL..... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sandy O'Connor Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Better yet, look up the multiple times that the
> > Obama admin's executive overreach has been
> smacked
> > down by the courts on Constitutional bases.
> > Recess appointments...
>
> Recess appointments are specifically provided for
> in the Constitution, dumbo. Maybe read it some
> day. What's not provided for of course is
> lame-ass efforts to pretend that Congress is never
> in recess so as to thwart to power plainly
> provided to the executive.
Supreme Court (unanimously) Rebukes Obama on Right of Appointment
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/us/supreme-court-president-recess-appointments.html?_r=0
>
> > ...NSA data collection...
>
> CLUE (since you don't have one): The Supreme
> Court has repeatedly upheld FISC authority and the
> periodic subpoena of Verizon phone records.
>
Judge: NSA domestic phone data-mining unconstitutional
http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/16/justice/nsa-surveillance-court-ruling/
> > ...Medicaid expansion...
>
> Medicaid expansion is perfectly legal, numbskull.
> What's not legal is using funding for existing
> Medicaid coverage as a lever to prod states into
> proceeding with expansion. Wonderful how all this
> simply sails right over your head. It's almost as
> if you were a total incompetent or something.
Which was as proposed by the administration and shot down by the court on constitutional grounds.
>
> ...EPA re CAA...
>
> Come on, fumble-fuck. The Court has TWICE upheld
> EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gasses. Too
> bad they can't regulate the noxious emissions that
> come pouring out of your lame and worse than sorry
> ass.
But not its independent ability to "creatively" adapt and unconstitutionally extend law as it sees fit through regulation. Which was the specific aspect struck down.
Quite a few other examples.