Asked if Ford would cut any U.S. jobs as part of its plans to build a new plant in Mexico, he responded; "Absolutely not. Zero. Not one job will be lost. Most of our investment is here in the US. And that's the way it will continue to be."
Related: Donald Trump pledges 4% economic growth. How realistic is that?

Earlier Thursday, Trump said in an interview on Fox News that Ford planned to "fire all their employees in the United States and...move to Mexico." He added that Ford would have to pay a 35% tax on any car that comes back to the U.S. if he becomes president. "And you know what's gonna happen, they're never going to leave."

Why doesn't Trump talk about wall anymore?

Why not just build the new assembly plant in Michigan?

tLL3N Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why not just build the new assembly plant in
> Michigan?

Because unless their are no illegal Mexicans that will for $5hr in Michigan. That why nobody is building in Michigan. American workers won't work for less than $50 hr.

Why do businesses want illegals here?

$15hr is earning a salary of $28,000 a year.

If you make $5hr you earn a salary of $9,600 a year.

Cost too Much Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tLL3N Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Why not just build the new assembly plant in
> > Michigan?
>
> Because unless their are no illegal Mexicans that
> will for $5hr in Michigan. That why nobody is
> building in Michigan. American workers won't work
> for less than $50 hr.

Why not build the new assembly plant in South Carolina or Mississippi or another right to work state with lower wages?

Why not encourage unemployed workers from Michigan to move where the jobs are?

another factor about a for profit country (cough - during obama not so - just bad communism)

is competing with the likes of NY,NY CHINA

CHINA, if they need soap for bins in bathrooms at schools, can say "hey china needs a supplier. we'll build a factory as a global supplier and export until other countries cannot compete". a high china official signs the paper. a new company is born

profit driven USA has to go (legally) by supply and demand - there is no profit in "eventual control of soap market" - only NY,NY would be interested in forming a deal with a foreign country on that "being in on the scam".

there's power but not profit in saying "hey i need soap - and gov is going to pick a winner and make a global soap factory that will be in control of other countries"

-------------------------------
it's called "dumping" but obama democrats dont care as long as NY,NY pays/tells them "not to look into this thing - where the money actually came from" (in the end, counterfeiting, a mere claim of control of the soap market and no one saying "oh hell no, pay up, let's see you build it using real money without any fake money - be a small soap factory you bastard")

THIS WOULD NOT BE SO BAD IF OBAMA HILLARY.GOV WERE SO INDUSTRIOUS AS CHINA TO USE THE VANTAGE POINT OF COMMUNIST RULE TO MAKE GLOBAL CONTROL COMPANIES - BUT OBAMA HILLARY DEMOCRATS SEEM RESOLUTE TO BUY BAD PROPERTY AND HAVE MEXICANS DO THEIR YARD WORK - IMPROVING THEIR STANDARD OF LIVING, STEALING THE FUTURE OF THEIR CHILDREN - LEAVING NO LEGACY OF JOBS AND FACTORIES BEHIND.

--------------------------
another factor is, as china says, allot of these companies in china are not owned by the chinese - though they are often blamed

Not building it? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why doesn't Trump talk about wall anymore?

The Mexican president told Trump ain't going to happen, go shit in your Make America Great hat.

Why not retrain the Ford workers to build the wall?

v7TMh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> another factor about a for profit country (cough -
> during obama not so - just bad communism)
>
> is competing with the likes of NY,NY CHINA
>
> CHINA, if they need soap for bins in bathrooms at
> schools, can say "hey china needs a supplier.
> we'll build a factory as a global supplier and
> export until other countries cannot compete". a
> high china official signs the paper. a new
> company is born

Are you implying that US government starts funding private businesses other than the defense industry? A socialism regime?

Trump fights for United Auto Workers jobs and libs hate him for it.

What fuck nutz.

Damn, the rednecks heads must be exploding. Ford vs Trump. Who do you side with?

Gunlover is so confused right now. He will never look at his shitty F-150 with the same fondness.

No mind you these Republican losers wanted to allow the automotive industry to go out of business 8 years ago. Now they're for tariffs to protect it?

You can thank Obama there is something to save.

President Trump. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Trump fights for United Auto Workers jobs and libs
> hate him for it.
>
> What fuck nutz.


Gerry's so confused.

United auto workers. Lmao. These rightards have become very funny trolls this election cycle.

You're not just useful idiots this election cycle. The pathetic attempts at con artistry in Trumps image by low level angry peasants has been quite entertaining.

Eat shit Gerry and don't lump Trump in with past Republicans.

lol, a new con artist but his shit is the same. You would be the shit.

Answer the question faggot, I mean Gerry

Hillary loves NAFTA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Answer the question faggot, I mean Gerry

NAFTA has been working great. Don't let Trump con you.

lol, rightards are still voting supply side waiting to get trickled on.