Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
Ejjrr
()
Date: January 04, 2019 04:27PM
To find enough to impeach.
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
ucyjf
()
Date: January 04, 2019 04:45PM
So your argument is that if a person is investigated for at least two years (or even twenty-five years), and the case is not wrapped up like an hour long murder mystery on TV, the investigators should all just go fuck off and leave the man (or woman) being investigated the hell alone.
Interesting point.
BTW, Mueller would be looking to indict, not impeach. Congress impeaches.
Interesting point.
BTW, Mueller would be looking to indict, not impeach. Congress impeaches.
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
Ejjrr
()
Date: January 04, 2019 04:53PM
ucyjf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So your argument is that if a person is
> investigated for at least two years (or even
> twenty-five years), and the case is not wrapped up
> like an hour long murder mystery on TV, the
> investigators should all just go fuck off and
> leave the man (or woman) being investigated the
> hell alone.
>
> Interesting point.
>
> BTW, Mueller would be looking to indict, not
> impeach. Congress impeaches.
They did that with ur dnc leaders
HEY, something just came to mind...I was just thinking how any of us can buy things and deal with other countries, right...SO HOW many of us used that Russian
Spyware like 8-10 years ago, I forget the name...does that mean we are all colluders? Was it “avast”?
-------------------------------------------------------
> So your argument is that if a person is
> investigated for at least two years (or even
> twenty-five years), and the case is not wrapped up
> like an hour long murder mystery on TV, the
> investigators should all just go fuck off and
> leave the man (or woman) being investigated the
> hell alone.
>
> Interesting point.
>
> BTW, Mueller would be looking to indict, not
> impeach. Congress impeaches.
They did that with ur dnc leaders
HEY, something just came to mind...I was just thinking how any of us can buy things and deal with other countries, right...SO HOW many of us used that Russian
Spyware like 8-10 years ago, I forget the name...does that mean we are all colluders? Was it “avast”?
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
xxxcj
()
Date: January 04, 2019 05:02PM
1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be very helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder". "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
But again, I don't want to misunderstand your point. If investigators investigate someone for two years and have not gotten indictment, they should back off. Leave the person alone. Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder". "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
But again, I don't want to misunderstand your point. If investigators investigate someone for two years and have not gotten indictment, they should back off. Leave the person alone. Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
Inquisitor Of It
()
Date: January 04, 2019 05:11PM
xxxcj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> point. If investigators investigate someone for
> two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> should back off. Leave the person alone.
> Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
Maybe what he's saying is that if there isn't a specific crime that
is known to have happened, that picking on someone you don't like
and investigating them for years --- to see if you can find any crime
they might have done -- shouldn't have started.
Mueller is not looking to indict.
There is nothing to indict Trump on!
What Mueller is doing is trying to tarnish Trump with guilt by
association: indicting former associates of crimes that were discovered
in the investigation, even though the investigation was started supposedly
to look into other things, and even though the crimes are unrelated to Trump,
and even though they happened before Trump, and even though they happened
many many years ago, and even though they are not actually violations of
any statute.
If you pick an enemy, and bring the unlimited resources of the Government
to bear, you can "investigate" someone and eventually you can find some
crime -- because everyone commits on average three felonies a day.
And if you can't find a nice plausible crime, you can destroy the person's
life in the process of the "investigation".
Just guessing thoguh.
-------------------------------------------------------
> But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> point. If investigators investigate someone for
> two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> should back off. Leave the person alone.
> Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
Maybe what he's saying is that if there isn't a specific crime that
is known to have happened, that picking on someone you don't like
and investigating them for years --- to see if you can find any crime
they might have done -- shouldn't have started.
Mueller is not looking to indict.
There is nothing to indict Trump on!
What Mueller is doing is trying to tarnish Trump with guilt by
association: indicting former associates of crimes that were discovered
in the investigation, even though the investigation was started supposedly
to look into other things, and even though the crimes are unrelated to Trump,
and even though they happened before Trump, and even though they happened
many many years ago, and even though they are not actually violations of
any statute.
If you pick an enemy, and bring the unlimited resources of the Government
to bear, you can "investigate" someone and eventually you can find some
crime -- because everyone commits on average three felonies a day.
And if you can't find a nice plausible crime, you can destroy the person's
life in the process of the "investigation".
Just guessing thoguh.
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
True story!
()
Date: January 04, 2019 05:18PM
xxxcj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be very
> helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
>
> 2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder".
> "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
>
> But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> point. If investigators investigate someone for
> two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> should back off. Leave the person alone.
> Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
No fuck that, I just told you guys about this Avast internet security, I should have known something was wrong when I needed assistance with avast and I had to call Russia!!! IM A FUCKING TRAITOR, Prague Russia has all my info!!!
Why didn’t Obama or Hillary warm us about this?
I colluded, Hillary and obama are to blame, A Russian malware company has all our info and we’re blaming trump!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be very
> helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
>
> 2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder".
> "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
>
> But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> point. If investigators investigate someone for
> two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> should back off. Leave the person alone.
> Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
No fuck that, I just told you guys about this Avast internet security, I should have known something was wrong when I needed assistance with avast and I had to call Russia!!! IM A FUCKING TRAITOR, Prague Russia has all my info!!!
Why didn’t Obama or Hillary warm us about this?
I colluded, Hillary and obama are to blame, A Russian malware company has all our info and we’re blaming trump!!
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
Jaill that Trump Swamp!
()
Date: January 04, 2019 05:27PM
Mueller already has enough to impeach. Just nice to continue to clean and jail the Trump swamp along with Trump.
Manafort, Cohen, Flynn... keep the jailing com'in!
Manafort, Cohen, Flynn... keep the jailing com'in!
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
xxxcj
()
Date: January 04, 2019 05:32PM
Inquisitor Of It Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> xxxcj Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> > point. If investigators investigate someone
> for
> > two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> > should back off. Leave the person alone.
> > Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
>
> Maybe what he's saying is that if there isn't a
> specific crime that
> is known to have happened, that picking on someone
> you don't like
> and investigating them for years --- to see if you
> can find any crime
> they might have done -- shouldn't have started.
>
> Mueller is not looking to indict.
> There is nothing to indict Trump on!
>
> What Mueller is doing is trying to tarnish Trump
> with guilt by
> association: indicting former associates of crimes
> that were discovered
> in the investigation, even though the
> investigation was started supposedly
> to look into other things, and even though the
> crimes are unrelated to Trump,
> and even though they happened before Trump, and
> even though they happened
> many many years ago, and even though they are not
> actually violations of
> any statute.
>
> If you pick an enemy, and bring the unlimited
> resources of the Government
> to bear, you can "investigate" someone and
> eventually you can find some
> crime -- because everyone commits on average three
> felonies a day.
> And if you can't find a nice plausible crime, you
> can destroy the person's
> life in the process of the "investigation".
> Just guessing thoguh.
Not sure that you are right about what he was trying to say. I hear what you are saying, though I question many (hell, most) of your assumptions. In the pre-Trump world, this would be viewed as at least similar in style to an organized crime investigation. Those take however long they take. From a political standpoint, though, Mueller does have an undefined, but real, deadline. At some point he will need to show results.
I would counsel patience, but I suspect you would tell me to fuck off. Which is your right as an American.
-------------------------------------------------------
> xxxcj Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> > point. If investigators investigate someone
> for
> > two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> > should back off. Leave the person alone.
> > Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
>
> Maybe what he's saying is that if there isn't a
> specific crime that
> is known to have happened, that picking on someone
> you don't like
> and investigating them for years --- to see if you
> can find any crime
> they might have done -- shouldn't have started.
>
> Mueller is not looking to indict.
> There is nothing to indict Trump on!
>
> What Mueller is doing is trying to tarnish Trump
> with guilt by
> association: indicting former associates of crimes
> that were discovered
> in the investigation, even though the
> investigation was started supposedly
> to look into other things, and even though the
> crimes are unrelated to Trump,
> and even though they happened before Trump, and
> even though they happened
> many many years ago, and even though they are not
> actually violations of
> any statute.
>
> If you pick an enemy, and bring the unlimited
> resources of the Government
> to bear, you can "investigate" someone and
> eventually you can find some
> crime -- because everyone commits on average three
> felonies a day.
> And if you can't find a nice plausible crime, you
> can destroy the person's
> life in the process of the "investigation".
> Just guessing thoguh.
Not sure that you are right about what he was trying to say. I hear what you are saying, though I question many (hell, most) of your assumptions. In the pre-Trump world, this would be viewed as at least similar in style to an organized crime investigation. Those take however long they take. From a political standpoint, though, Mueller does have an undefined, but real, deadline. At some point he will need to show results.
I would counsel patience, but I suspect you would tell me to fuck off. Which is your right as an American.
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
Jimmy 2 times
()
Date: January 04, 2019 05:39PM
xxxcj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquisitor Of It Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > xxxcj Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> > > point. If investigators investigate someone
> > for
> > > two years and have not gotten indictment,
> they
> > > should back off. Leave the person alone.
> > > Apologize, even. Is that what you are
> saying?
> >
> > Maybe what he's saying is that if there isn't a
> > specific crime that
> > is known to have happened, that picking on
> someone
> > you don't like
> > and investigating them for years --- to see if
> you
> > can find any crime
> > they might have done -- shouldn't have started.
> >
> > Mueller is not looking to indict.
> > There is nothing to indict Trump on!
> >
> > What Mueller is doing is trying to tarnish
> Trump
> > with guilt by
> > association: indicting former associates of
> crimes
> > that were discovered
> > in the investigation, even though the
> > investigation was started supposedly
> > to look into other things, and even though the
> > crimes are unrelated to Trump,
> > and even though they happened before Trump, and
> > even though they happened
> > many many years ago, and even though they are
> not
> > actually violations of
> > any statute.
> >
> > If you pick an enemy, and bring the unlimited
> > resources of the Government
> > to bear, you can "investigate" someone and
> > eventually you can find some
> > crime -- because everyone commits on average
> three
> > felonies a day.
> > And if you can't find a nice plausible crime,
> you
> > can destroy the person's
> > life in the process of the "investigation".
>
> > Just guessing thoguh.
>
> Not sure that you are right about what he was
> trying to say. I hear what you are saying, though
> I question many (hell, most) of your assumptions.
> In the pre-Trump world, this would be viewed as at
> least similar in style to an organized crime
> investigation. Those take however long they take.
> From a political standpoint, though, Mueller does
> have an undefined, but real, deadline. At some
> point he will need to show results.
>
> I would counsel patience, but I suspect you would
> tell me to fuck off. Which is your right as an
> American.
Don’t even go there
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mTTp3ub5s
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquisitor Of It Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > xxxcj Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> > > point. If investigators investigate someone
> > for
> > > two years and have not gotten indictment,
> they
> > > should back off. Leave the person alone.
> > > Apologize, even. Is that what you are
> saying?
> >
> > Maybe what he's saying is that if there isn't a
> > specific crime that
> > is known to have happened, that picking on
> someone
> > you don't like
> > and investigating them for years --- to see if
> you
> > can find any crime
> > they might have done -- shouldn't have started.
> >
> > Mueller is not looking to indict.
> > There is nothing to indict Trump on!
> >
> > What Mueller is doing is trying to tarnish
> Trump
> > with guilt by
> > association: indicting former associates of
> crimes
> > that were discovered
> > in the investigation, even though the
> > investigation was started supposedly
> > to look into other things, and even though the
> > crimes are unrelated to Trump,
> > and even though they happened before Trump, and
> > even though they happened
> > many many years ago, and even though they are
> not
> > actually violations of
> > any statute.
> >
> > If you pick an enemy, and bring the unlimited
> > resources of the Government
> > to bear, you can "investigate" someone and
> > eventually you can find some
> > crime -- because everyone commits on average
> three
> > felonies a day.
> > And if you can't find a nice plausible crime,
> you
> > can destroy the person's
> > life in the process of the "investigation".
>
> > Just guessing thoguh.
>
> Not sure that you are right about what he was
> trying to say. I hear what you are saying, though
> I question many (hell, most) of your assumptions.
> In the pre-Trump world, this would be viewed as at
> least similar in style to an organized crime
> investigation. Those take however long they take.
> From a political standpoint, though, Mueller does
> have an undefined, but real, deadline. At some
> point he will need to show results.
>
> I would counsel patience, but I suspect you would
> tell me to fuck off. Which is your right as an
> American.
Don’t even go there
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mTTp3ub5s
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
v3hkc
()
Date: January 04, 2019 06:10PM
xxxcj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be very
> helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
>
> 2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder".
> "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
>
> But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> point. If investigators investigate someone for
> two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> should back off. Leave the person alone.
> Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
Yes. If you have a specific crime to investigate then investigate it. If you can't even find a crime then there is nothing to investigate. If you are just going on a fishing expedition and got nothing after 2 years then it is time to wrap it up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be very
> helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
>
> 2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder".
> "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
>
> But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> point. If investigators investigate someone for
> two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> should back off. Leave the person alone.
> Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
Yes. If you have a specific crime to investigate then investigate it. If you can't even find a crime then there is nothing to investigate. If you are just going on a fishing expedition and got nothing after 2 years then it is time to wrap it up.
Re: Mueller needs 6 more months to pulls something out of his ass
Posted by:
6th4v
()
Date: January 04, 2019 06:37PM
v3hkc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> xxxcj Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be
> very
> > helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
> >
> > 2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder".
> > "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
> >
> > But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> > point. If investigators investigate someone
> for
> > two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> > should back off. Leave the person alone.
> > Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
>
>
> Yes. If you have a specific crime to investigate
> then investigate it. If you can't even find a
> crime then there is nothing to investigate. If
> you are just going on a fishing expedition and got
> nothing after 2 years then it is time to wrap it
> up.
Well, at this point Trump knows, at least for the most part, what Mueller has. Whitaker would make sure of it. Now if Trump is innocent, and Mueller was going to clear him, he would be acting very differently than he does now. Shit, he probably would not say a word about the whole thing, because he would not need to. So we can be pretty sure Mueller is not going to clear him
Another possibility is that Mueller is fabricating the whole thing. Because of Whitaker, Trump would not only know what was happening, he would know how it was happening. Now, if this was the case, Trump would find a judge who would order federal marshals to seize everything Mueller has. And I would support him in doing so, so long as the evidence was in fact preserved. But that has not happened, so the Mueller/fabrication theory has some holes.
Anybody got any other scenarios?
-------------------------------------------------------
> xxxcj Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 1. Avast is a Czech company. Google can be
> very
> > helpful in avoiding embarrassing statements.
> >
> > 2. Your posts do not suggest "colluder".
> > "Collaborator", maybe, but not "colluder".
> >
> > But again, I don't want to misunderstand your
> > point. If investigators investigate someone
> for
> > two years and have not gotten indictment, they
> > should back off. Leave the person alone.
> > Apologize, even. Is that what you are saying?
>
>
> Yes. If you have a specific crime to investigate
> then investigate it. If you can't even find a
> crime then there is nothing to investigate. If
> you are just going on a fishing expedition and got
> nothing after 2 years then it is time to wrap it
> up.
Well, at this point Trump knows, at least for the most part, what Mueller has. Whitaker would make sure of it. Now if Trump is innocent, and Mueller was going to clear him, he would be acting very differently than he does now. Shit, he probably would not say a word about the whole thing, because he would not need to. So we can be pretty sure Mueller is not going to clear him
Another possibility is that Mueller is fabricating the whole thing. Because of Whitaker, Trump would not only know what was happening, he would know how it was happening. Now, if this was the case, Trump would find a judge who would order federal marshals to seize everything Mueller has. And I would support him in doing so, so long as the evidence was in fact preserved. But that has not happened, so the Mueller/fabrication theory has some holes.
Anybody got any other scenarios?