These Jews, telling everyone else, what they want them to think.
We also offered a recent historical example of this activity’s use as a weapon to attack
an institution of the United States. In our example, the target of this weapon was the United
States military, an institution that was aggressively targeted by these Jews, starting in
the early 1990s, as they attempted to normalize homosexual behavior.
The central, essential activity of these Jews, and the example of its application against
the U.S. military that we introduced in the first essay, leave us with a number intriguing
questions. The most important, “to what end?” is a question that we are unable to answer
satisfactorily without more information.
We can speculate, of course, and we can make educated guesses based on the examples of the
essential activity of these Jews that we can observe, but we cannot know for sure of their
longer-term objectives or desired end state.
For this second essay, we provide additional examples of the central activity of these Jews
in its day-to-day use with the intent that our readers will, after reading the two essays,
be able to readily identify its use in practice by these Jews. In addition, we begin to
answer an important question:
What is it that these Jews want us to think?
In other words, can we identify a general classification or category for the messages that
these Jews communicate to us as they aggressively undertake their central activity of telling
us what they want us to think?
We begin with additional examples of the essential activity of these Jews beyond that which
we introduced in our first essay: the aggressive, centralized, systematic, methodical effort
by these Jews to normalize homosexual behavior.
As we have seen over the past thirty years, the success that these Jews have had at normalizing
homosexual behavior has not been enough to satisfy them, and they have followed it with even
more aggressive attempts to normalize a related form of mental illness that has the same
effect (sterilization of the victim) as homosexual behavior.
In their attempts to normalize this related form of mental illness, which has traditionally
been referred to as “gender identity disorder,” these Jews claim that one’s biological sex
should not be considered a barrier to self-discovery. In other words, these Jews want
people to think that they should sterilize themselves by removing or permanently mutilating
their genitals in order to liberate themselves from the “prison” of biological sex.
But these Jews don’t stop there. These Jews also claim that anyone who attempts to exercise
prudence in the face of their systematic, methodical, sexual mutilation and sterilization
program (a program that targets children and young people in particular) is guilty of
participating in a “genocide” against the “trans-gender” population.
This rhetoric, as preposterous as it sounds, has been incredibly effective in serving the
tribal interests of these Jews. For example, in March, 2023 a “trans gender” person who had
fallen victim to what these Jews wanted them to think, carried out a terrorist attack
against a Christian school in Tennessee that killed multiple children.
Considering the orchestration of this sterilization program by these Jews, and their
associated rhetoric regarding the “genocide” and “holocaust” of the “trans-gender” people
who are their victims, we should expect to see more terrorist attacks carried out by people
who have made the grave mistake of mutilating or sterilizing themselves because they
believed what these Jews wanted them to think.
At this point, we have covered two of the more prominent examples of the central activity
of these Jews: these Jews normalizing homosexual behavior by aggressively telling people
to think that it is perfectly normal, and these Jews attempting to normalize the
sterilization and sexual mutilation of children by telling us to think that it is a form of
“healthcare” that children have a “right” to receive, and that medical professionals have
a “duty” to dispense. In both cases, regardless of the claims made by these Jews, the actual
effect on the victims is the same: sterilization.
Numerous parallels to the claims of these Jews about homosexual behavior and the sexual
mutilation of children are also to be found in the claims that these Jews make about abortion.
Like their claims about the sexual mutilation of our children, these Jews go to great
lengths to attempt to make us think that abortion is an indispensable form of “healthcare”
for women and that any attempt to exercise prudence or restraint around the matter infringes
on the rights of women to obtain “healthcare.”
Like the peculiar enthusiasm with which these Jews have undertaken their efforts to
normalize homosexual behavior, the sheer zealotry expressed by these Jews as they attempt
to convince women to dispose of their unborn children must pique the curiosity of any
intelligent person.
Certainly, one cannot help but notice that the attempts by these Jews to impose abortion
on the masses has a a religious intensity to it. And one can easily be left with the
impression that these Jews maintain an intense desire to spread a false religion of infant
sacrifice by targeting vulnerable women in the same manner that they target young people
and children for sexual mutilation.
Such a false religion certainly has historical precedent and is one of the more dangerous
applications of the central, essential activity that these Jews center their entire
existence around.
Furthermore, considering the prominence of these Jews in the contemporary movements
(diversity, democracy, man-made global-warming) that reasonably qualify as “false religions,”
we can conclude that the false religion is a natural offshoot of the central activity of
these Jews and that it must thus be considered another weapon in the arsenal that they
deploy against us.
In sum, given the three examples we have just covered, we can start to answer the question
that we posed earlier in this essay: What is it that these Jews want us to think? If the
examples we have just provided are an indication, then among the highest priorities of what
these Jews want us to think, is:
That self-destruction is something to aspire to.
Of course, the list of destructive behaviors that these Jews want us to think are normal,
noble, and virtuous is not limited to the homosexuality, the sexual mutilation and
sterilization of children, and the abortion that we discussed above. Numerous other
examples are to be found in the areas of drug and alcohol use, and the fervent calls from
these Jews for “tolerance” of crime, criminality, and criminals.
In the essays following this one, we will explore the broader implications and effects of
the central activity of these Jews. Implications and effects that go far beyond homosexual
behavior, the sexual mutilation of children, and abortion.