the opening motions determine if the Trial can begin

AND THEY AREN'T EVEN COVERING IT

Did Trump file a motion of challenge? Was the challenge denied?

did the judge issue a reasoning for denial?

-------------

jurors - separate article - that was a huge fraud nobody didn't notice

also - this "isn't the first judge in the civil trial about money"

THAT IS - THIS HISPANIC FOREIGN AGENT JUDGE ISN'T THE FIRST, who has obvious democrat and foreign ties including with the biden campaign

THE LAST WAS AN OLD KROUT WHO LOOKED LIKE A ROCK BAND REJECT (he issued judgement against trump - but this was never appealed at a federal court outside of NY - which is of course, a scam)

this is like niggers in DC ruling against West Virginia on whether coal should be cheaper in a DC court. a total fucking scam. and dc niggers tried it. it is federal courts that dis-allowed it.

AND BEFORE THAT WAS A FEMALE NIGGER JUDGE WHO'D BEEN IN THE NAACP - made many past black rulings - i'm unsure it was the money case - there are so many

----------------------


FURTHERMORE, THERE IS DOUBLE JEOPARDY BY THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WHICH IS OTHER WISE KNOWN AS RACKETEERING USING COURTS - WHICH IN MY OPINION IS A DEATH PENALTY

THEY HAVE NAMED PROPERTIES HE "over-valued" (but not for what loan or whether the lender cared or if any loan was made at all)

THE SAME PROPERTIES APPEARED IN PREVIOUS SUITS FILE BY NEW YORK STATING HE'D UNDER-VALUED THE PROPERTY TO AVOID TAXES


SO IF HE WINS ONE SUIT HE LOOSES

IF HE WINS THE OTHER SUIT HE LOOSES

HOWEVER THE JUDGE IS AN OVERPAID FOREGEIGN TERRORIST BRIBED SACK OF SHIT WHICH IS WHY THEY'VE SOUGHT USING THE COURT AS A WEAPON

AND I STILL STICK WITH THE DEATH PENALTY FOR THE JUDGE STATEMENT

IT'S ALSO THE CASE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE WAS DE-REGULATED BY CLINTON AND I WANT SOME DEATH PENALTIES GOING OUT ABOUT SOMETHIGN CALLED "GOLDEN PARACHUTES" WHICH NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ACTUATED BY REFUSING TO PUNISH

---------------------

^^ ah now i remember. my poitn there is OBAMA WAS ACCUSED of "IRS buying weapons and stalking republicans"

my point is these cases aren't the usual way to collect tax

(a chess game of too high or too low, that is two lawsuits, is not how tax court is usually done; infact i think if we look at other cases - when it's tax time the taxes are negotiated not in that manner - especially among favored democrats - like general mills who outsourced cereal to mexico)

------------------


The engagement letters, signed by a combination of
Weisselberg, Donald Trump, and Donald Trump, Jr., confirmed this by unambiguously
acknowledging that Donald Trump, through his trustees, was responsible for the preparation and
fair presentation of the personal financial information in accordance with GAAP

THE PAPERS ARE SELF CONFLICTING, saying trump did not organize the financial papers and the papers were agreed by the accuser to have been done by accounting codes, but had "created" the value of certain properties without accountants

BOTH CANNOT BE TRUE

ALSO - usually the LENDER must check the lending statements before giving a loan especial property valued over a small amount

THIS WOULD BE A PREDATORY LENDER CASE, THEN

but the lender didn't file the suit - the government did

------------------------------


Bender made absolutely clear that under the terms of the engagement for compilation services3


THIS LITIGANT DID NOT GIVEN ANY LOAN

HE'S SOME HACK WHO WAS GIVEN ACCESS to papers and made a report

he never gave trump any loans - the lawsuit is about loans made that did not occur, according to the executive summary

EVEN AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE TOP LEVEL COULD AFFORD TO MENTION WHO THE LENDER WAS, THE AMOUNT, not just simply a list of Trump properties the government was interested in seizing

-----------------------------


Deutsche Bank’s Private

is a fucking hitler attacking russia. they're probably behind the prosecution.

TRUMP CERTAINLY DID NOT TRY TO BORROM MONEY from a germany who's attacking russia - that fact has been all over the news

YOU COULD PUT THAT IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT BUT I'D REQUIRE FORENSIC EVIDENCE - and spy tests of who was a spy in the usa

------------------------------


I NOW HAVE A CLAIM BY GMHB GERMANS, SCUM OF EARCH, THAT DONALD WANTED TO BUY A RESORT SO WENT TO GERMAN BANKS FOR A LOAN

(highly improbable, since he'd know they would try to extort him)

Germany = Gesellschaft mit beschrankter Haftung = insurance companies that lie = product warrantees that never repair broken products shipt them back en-route

TRUMP DIDN'T GET A GERMAN LOAN, HE WAS NOT DESPARATE FOR A LOAN SO BADLY HE'D TRAVEL THE WORLD AND SUCK NAZZI BOOTS FOR A LOAN

also the document admits; that they knew he could cover the loan


the document admits they didn't check the loan , then also admits they knew the loan could be covered

and that the bank, which did not sue by USSC (required for foreign bank) - IS NOT NAMED AS INJURED

which is just more spam on my pile i'm getting very fucking angry

---------------------------------

i know when i own highrises in NYC and look for loans to buy a small property, a golf course, the first thing i do is hop on a plane to germany, who recently shot two airforce officers looking for a hacker because ... they might find the hacker ... and "ask for a loan outside of the countyr"

sure, happens all the time

bullshit

-----------------------

would not have done business
with Donald Trump without a personal guarantee

the language of liars. that has 0 todo with accounting and foreign trade regulation.

---------------------------


any dealings with them would have been because the CROOKED GERMAN BANK owned the property, not because they were giving loans

what do you want to bet?

---------------------------


THE DOCUMENT NEVER CLAIMS THE 1ST OR 2ND LOAN FAILED

only that "there were conditions of retaining value"


THESE SAME CONDITIONS THE GERMANS HAVE NOT KEPT - WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE ATTACKING RUSSIA

AND WHY GERMANS ARE HACKING NETSCAPE AND HELPING JAPAN TRY TO ISSUE 18% LOANS TO AMERICANS WHICH ARE WHOLEY ILLEGAL

IT IS CALLED LOAN SHARKING


GERMAN BANKS MY ASS

-----------------------------------

I discussed in another article (if not below - spam may have killed the edit and i want that spammer DEAD for wasting my valuable time - he can shit post in his own posts not mine).

Property should be taxed or given Sales tax: NOT BOTH
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/4146615.html

property should be taxed when bought or when sold

government "asking how much your realestate is worth on a tax form" is bullfeathers because government assigns the value anyway (mentioned above already unless the attacked article knocked that out).


THE POINT here is a demand for "property tax" not on purchase value* is legally:

A DEMAND THAT THE PROPERTY BE USED TO BEST POSSIBLE PRACTICES, that if you have a farm you must farm the land, BLM, bureau of land management.

THAT USED TO BE ILLEGAL - it used to be an owner of property could NOT be approached by government to be told "to utilize the property better"

A GOV THAT SETS A LAND VALUE HIGHER THAN PURCHASE PRICE, who is going to tax on sale but doesn't know the sale value: is a DEMAND for the owner to use the property to create money out of nowhere (assuming they aren't selling the property)

they can make a CRIMINALLY HIGH VALUE on the property and demand the owner do CRIMINAL ACTS to pay the rent and or insure (china, corrupt niggers) are involved to generate that income - which then exposes the owner to being convicted whenever the corrupt chinese niggers feel the opportunity is ripe

REGUARDLESS - the Constitution never allowed "low utility of use taxation". It spells out PROPERTY OWNERSHIP as a right and no right of government to remove the right. Meaning - it is not legal to "tax property continually at a rate so high it becomes automatically owned by niggers"

(purchase value - ok add perhaps some not but not democrat made hyper inflation)

little red riding hood

.