there are some critical points to corporations that are beneficial
1) they keep secrets from foreign countries unless those foreign countries PAY UP*(1)
2) they aren't allowed to use weapons to force consumers to buy products
3) they are REGULATED; they aren't allowed to "simply move to mexico" if the future of USA's military and jobs rely them. ie - hostile foreign take-overs that benefit no-one but CEO are REGULATED. "they must pay workers and upgrade and compete". if they are found in deep state "non-competitive activities" they - rather than USA citizens - may be removed
4) the public need not invade capitol buildings surrounded by chinese armed guards TO GET JUSTICE: they can simply
boycott the product in question; case closed
these of course are optimal. in the end an honest government can be more efficient and use weapons less than a corrupt UNREGULATED corporate chinese. however weapons tend to empower
(1) not including corporate corruption which is a problem of 'public holdings in combination with CLINTON de-regulation' - which is corrupt government not corporatism)
this boy looks more like a girl and the Cott looks like it will fall apart right out of the box
one weakness of Capitolism is if OBAMASCHOOL teaches children to consume bad foreign products when they themselves have no JOB to pay for said stupid imports - kids can loose their competitive future merely by making bad choices