The Junkies are just awful. That's why the thought of their show being better-known than D&M's (still don't buy it, BTW) gives me douche chills.

Four Hour Club Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another good "bit" today; LFF has to be taught how
> to bathe his 6+ month old son since has yet to do
> that, or take care of the kid for more than one
> hour.


But he wouldn't trade it for the World

peekza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh I forgot, I guess Wichita and Iowa were huge.
> I
> > would put the Sports Junkies as being more well
> > known at this point than Don and Mike in their
> > prime. Quite frankly a better show with
> longevity
> > top to bottom as well. They have staying power
> in
> > any format.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
>
> Are you fucking kidding me? The Junkies? A better
> show? Mike ranting in a shit stained studio is
> better than their "hurting" asses...Cakes an d EB
> are bearable, but I would rather listen to MandL
> than listen to JP or Lurch...

Agreed on JP, but I like Lurch. Still find them more entertaining than Big O and Dukes, Don or TMOS. They are still on the air. Don or Mike have been fired multiple times. Numbers and ratings don't lie.

Just my 2 cents.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/19/2014 10:29PM by Dons BlackBerry.

Lost of crabbing about Don Money Mike Pay versus Free

But remember Ronic will be Don G's biz manager

Don needs to keep a keen eye on all those payment$

semper fat

enzo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> all I ever wanted was
> for them all to entertain me again. I think they
> have it in them.
> Pretty simple.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOLscar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Answer to Bill Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > As already mentioned Steve Dahl ' Tom
> Leykis
> > '
> > > > Marc Maron
> > > >
> > > > It has/ is being done. Just superior talent
> > > with
> > > > dedicated fan bases.
> > > > Yes, Don makes the cut there.
> > >
> > > Disagree. Outside of 2 or 3 markets Don or
> Mike
> > > were not known. In fact I grew up in Richmond
> > and
> > > never heard of them until I moved to NOVA in
> > the
> > > late 90's. Howard Stern/ O&A are well known.
> > Don't
> > > get it twisted thinking Don or Mike are that
> > well
> > > known. Get out of your DC or Sacramento
> bubble.
> >
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > You can't be this dense. I hopped around a few
> > southern states before I landed in Canada about
> 10
> > years ago. In every state I went to, D and M
> were
> > syndicated and fairly well known. Not
> necessarily
> > liked, but known. When I landed in Canada, I
> was
> > amazed that they were even syndicated there in
> a
> > few provinces and people knew them. You telling
> > someone to get out of their bubble is hypocrisy
> to
> > the highest degree. They obviously weren't
> stern
> > or o and a, but to say they weren't known
> outside
> > of DC and Sacramento is idiotic. Just because
> YOU
> > hadn't heard of them while living in Richmond
> > doesn't mean everyone hadn't. So again, get out
> of
> > your fucking bubble of ignorance. Jesus.
>
>
> If you look at my original post I said 2 or 3
> (major) markets. They were not on here in
> Richmond. Howard was on briefly here, but that did
> not last long. I lived in Denver and they were not
> on there. Yes they were syndicated, but not in
> major markets other than DC. So, to think that
> people all around this country heard of them is
> delusional. Only people that were DC transplants
> or the 20-30 markets they were in would have heard
> of them.
>
> Facts are facts. Think with your head not your
> heart, Skippy.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

So I guess Toronto isn't a large market? I guess New York City is small too? When I lived in Texas I was able to hear them (can't remember if it was a Texas station or just a signal that reached there). I could go through the list of their syndications and show that you're wrong, but it's pointless. You'll just point to them never being syndicated in LA as proof that no one knows them. Keep up the good work skippy. You have yet to write a post that wasn't full of mis-information. Or Miss Information, if you will. I will! Wocka wocka.

From our friend Will on the TMOS Page. Noticed we are mentioned.

Also notice he is threatening gestapo action.

So he spouts hate towards us, then threatens everyone for spouting hate.


-
Attachments:

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOLscar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Answer to Bill Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > As already mentioned Steve Dahl ' Tom
> > Leykis
> > > '
> > > > > Marc Maron
> > > > >
> > > > > It has/ is being done. Just superior
> talent
> > > > with
> > > > > dedicated fan bases.
> > > > > Yes, Don makes the cut there.
> > > >
> > > > Disagree. Outside of 2 or 3 markets Don or
> > Mike
> > > > were not known. In fact I grew up in
> Richmond
> > > and
> > > > never heard of them until I moved to NOVA
> in
> > > the
> > > > late 90's. Howard Stern/ O&A are well
> known.
> > > Don't
> > > > get it twisted thinking Don or Mike are
> that
> > > well
> > > > known. Get out of your DC or Sacramento
> > bubble.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > You can't be this dense. I hopped around a
> few
> > > southern states before I landed in Canada
> about
> > 10
> > > years ago. In every state I went to, D and M
> > were
> > > syndicated and fairly well known. Not
> > necessarily
> > > liked, but known. When I landed in Canada, I
> > was
> > > amazed that they were even syndicated there
> in
> > a
> > > few provinces and people knew them. You
> telling
> > > someone to get out of their bubble is
> hypocrisy
> > to
> > > the highest degree. They obviously weren't
> > stern
> > > or o and a, but to say they weren't known
> > outside
> > > of DC and Sacramento is idiotic. Just because
> > YOU
> > > hadn't heard of them while living in Richmond
> > > doesn't mean everyone hadn't. So again, get
> out
> > of
> > > your fucking bubble of ignorance. Jesus.
> >
> >
> > If you look at my original post I said 2 or 3
> > (major) markets. They were not on here in
> > Richmond. Howard was on briefly here, but that
> did
> > not last long. I lived in Denver and they were
> not
> > on there. Yes they were syndicated, but not in
> > major markets other than DC. So, to think that
> > people all around this country heard of them is
> > delusional. Only people that were DC
> transplants
> > or the 20-30 markets they were in would have
> heard
> > of them.
> >
> > Facts are facts. Think with your head not your
> > heart, Skippy.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> So I guess Toronto isn't a large market? I guess
> New York City is small too? When I lived in Texas
> I was able to hear them (can't remember if it was
> a Texas station or just a signal that reached
> there). I could go through the list of their
> syndications and show that you're wrong, but it's
> pointless. You'll just point to them never being
> syndicated in LA as proof that no one knows them.
> Keep up the good work skippy. You have yet to
> write a post that wasn't full of mis-information.
> Or Miss Information, if you will. I will! Wocka
> wocka.


Not really sure how you heard them in Canada, maybe from Buffalo. At the most they had 26 affiliates. New York was a disaster and lasted maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were never in major markets. Facts are facts. Google it. Name another major market, Skippy?

Just my 2 cents.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/19/2014 10:53PM by Dons BlackBerry.

Another major market? How bout your moms ass?

345...Semper Fat...
Attachments:

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOLscar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > LOLscar Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Answer to Bill Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > As already mentioned Steve Dahl ' Tom
> > > Leykis
> > > > '
> > > > > > Marc Maron
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It has/ is being done. Just superior
> > talent
> > > > > with
> > > > > > dedicated fan bases.
> > > > > > Yes, Don makes the cut there.
> > > > >
> > > > > Disagree. Outside of 2 or 3 markets Don
> or
> > > Mike
> > > > > were not known. In fact I grew up in
> > Richmond
> > > > and
> > > > > never heard of them until I moved to NOVA
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > late 90's. Howard Stern/ O&A are well
> > known.
> > > > Don't
> > > > > get it twisted thinking Don or Mike are
> > that
> > > > well
> > > > > known. Get out of your DC or Sacramento
> > > bubble.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > You can't be this dense. I hopped around a
> > few
> > > > southern states before I landed in Canada
> > about
> > > 10
> > > > years ago. In every state I went to, D and
> M
> > > were
> > > > syndicated and fairly well known. Not
> > > necessarily
> > > > liked, but known. When I landed in Canada,
> I
> > > was
> > > > amazed that they were even syndicated there
> > in
> > > a
> > > > few provinces and people knew them. You
> > telling
> > > > someone to get out of their bubble is
> > hypocrisy
> > > to
> > > > the highest degree. They obviously weren't
> > > stern
> > > > or o and a, but to say they weren't known
> > > outside
> > > > of DC and Sacramento is idiotic. Just
> because
> > > YOU
> > > > hadn't heard of them while living in
> Richmond
> > > > doesn't mean everyone hadn't. So again, get
> > out
> > > of
> > > > your fucking bubble of ignorance. Jesus.
> > >
> > >
> > > If you look at my original post I said 2 or 3
> > > (major) markets. They were not on here in
> > > Richmond. Howard was on briefly here, but
> that
> > did
> > > not last long. I lived in Denver and they
> were
> > not
> > > on there. Yes they were syndicated, but not
> in
> > > major markets other than DC. So, to think
> that
> > > people all around this country heard of them
> is
> > > delusional. Only people that were DC
> > transplants
> > > or the 20-30 markets they were in would have
> > heard
> > > of them.
> > >
> > > Facts are facts. Think with your head not
> your
> > > heart, Skippy.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > So I guess Toronto isn't a large market? I
> guess
> > New York City is small too? When I lived in
> Texas
> > I was able to hear them (can't remember if it
> was
> > a Texas station or just a signal that reached
> > there). I could go through the list of their
> > syndications and show that you're wrong, but
> it's
> > pointless. You'll just point to them never
> being
> > syndicated in LA as proof that no one knows
> them.
> > Keep up the good work skippy. You have yet to
> > write a post that wasn't full of
> mis-information.
> > Or Miss Information, if you will. I will! Wocka
> > wocka.
>
>
> Not really sure how you heard them in Canada,
> maybe from Buffalo. At the most they had 26
> affiliates. New York was a disaster and lasted
> maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were never in
> major markets. Facts are facts. Google it. Name
> another major market, Skippy?
>
> Just my 2 cents.

You are arguing over semantics now. What makes a market major? This is your opinion so anything I say you can come back with "that's not major". Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn good. And I think it was more than that since Toronto isn't on the list but they were absolutely syndicated there for a while. I remember them discussing their new canadian syndication and they did a little bit about Canada.

Your point was they are not known outside of DC. Well, not known outside of DC, Virginia, Maryland, Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York, etc etc. you also have to take into account all the surrounding areas that still got the signal (ie. me listening in Texas when I don't think they had a syndication there). You made a statement that wasn't correct. They absolutely were in some major markets. Just because they weren't in every top 10 market doesn't mean they aren't known outside of DC. That's simply not true and no amount of you trying to talk your way out will change that. They were never Stern, but they had a pretty large following all across the map.

Skippy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Another major market? How bout your moms ass?


You sir are a little bitch. What are you like 12 bringing mom's into it. Internet tough guy.

Just my 2 cents.

LoLoscar is right...you're just backpedaling now...

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOLscar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > LOLscar Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Answer to Bill Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > As already mentioned Steve Dahl ' Tom
> > > > Leykis
> > > > > '
> > > > > > > Marc Maron
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It has/ is being done. Just superior
> > > talent
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > dedicated fan bases.
> > > > > > > Yes, Don makes the cut there.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Disagree. Outside of 2 or 3 markets Don
> > or
> > > > Mike
> > > > > > were not known. In fact I grew up in
> > > Richmond
> > > > > and
> > > > > > never heard of them until I moved to
> NOVA
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > late 90's. Howard Stern/ O&A are well
> > > known.
> > > > > Don't
> > > > > > get it twisted thinking Don or Mike are
> > > that
> > > > > well
> > > > > > known. Get out of your DC or Sacramento
> > > > bubble.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can't be this dense. I hopped around
> a
> > > few
> > > > > southern states before I landed in Canada
> > > about
> > > > 10
> > > > > years ago. In every state I went to, D
> and
> > M
> > > > were
> > > > > syndicated and fairly well known. Not
> > > > necessarily
> > > > > liked, but known. When I landed in
> Canada,
> > I
> > > > was
> > > > > amazed that they were even syndicated
> there
> > > in
> > > > a
> > > > > few provinces and people knew them. You
> > > telling
> > > > > someone to get out of their bubble is
> > > hypocrisy
> > > > to
> > > > > the highest degree. They obviously
> weren't
> > > > stern
> > > > > or o and a, but to say they weren't known
> > > > outside
> > > > > of DC and Sacramento is idiotic. Just
> > because
> > > > YOU
> > > > > hadn't heard of them while living in
> > Richmond
> > > > > doesn't mean everyone hadn't. So again,
> get
> > > out
> > > > of
> > > > > your fucking bubble of ignorance. Jesus.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you look at my original post I said 2 or
> 3
> > > > (major) markets. They were not on here in
> > > > Richmond. Howard was on briefly here, but
> > that
> > > did
> > > > not last long. I lived in Denver and they
> > were
> > > not
> > > > on there. Yes they were syndicated, but not
> > in
> > > > major markets other than DC. So, to think
> > that
> > > > people all around this country heard of
> them
> > is
> > > > delusional. Only people that were DC
> > > transplants
> > > > or the 20-30 markets they were in would
> have
> > > heard
> > > > of them.
> > > >
> > > > Facts are facts. Think with your head not
> > your
> > > > heart, Skippy.
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > So I guess Toronto isn't a large market? I
> > guess
> > > New York City is small too? When I lived in
> > Texas
> > > I was able to hear them (can't remember if it
> > was
> > > a Texas station or just a signal that reached
> > > there). I could go through the list of their
> > > syndications and show that you're wrong, but
> > it's
> > > pointless. You'll just point to them never
> > being
> > > syndicated in LA as proof that no one knows
> > them.
> > > Keep up the good work skippy. You have yet to
> > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > mis-information.
> > > Or Miss Information, if you will. I will!
> Wocka
> > > wocka.
> >
> >
> > Not really sure how you heard them in Canada,
> > maybe from Buffalo. At the most they had 26
> > affiliates. New York was a disaster and lasted
> > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were never
> in
> > major markets. Facts are facts. Google it. Name
> > another major market, Skippy?
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> You are arguing over semantics now. What makes a
> market major? This is your opinion so anything I
> say you can come back with "that's not major".
> Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn good. And I
> think it was more than that since Toronto isn't on
> the list but they were absolutely syndicated there
> for a while. I remember them discussing their new
> canadian syndication and they did a little bit
> about Canada.
>
> Your point was they are not known outside of DC.
> Well, not known outside of DC, Virginia, Maryland,
> Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York, etc etc.
> you also have to take into account all the
> surrounding areas that still got the signal (ie.
> me listening in Texas when I don't think they had
> a syndication there). You made a statement that
> wasn't correct. They absolutely were in some major
> markets. Just because they weren't in every top 10
> market doesn't mean they aren't known outside of
> DC. That's simply not true and no amount of you
> trying to talk your way out will change that. They
> were never Stern, but they had a pretty large
> following all across the map.

TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS

1 New York NY yes briefly
2 Los Angeles CA no
3 Chicago IL no
4 San Francisco CA no
5 Dallas TX no
6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
8 Washington DC yes
9 Atlanta GA no
10 Detroit MI no
11 Boston MA no
12 Miami FL no
13 Puerto Rico PR no
14 Seattle WA no
15 Phoenix AZ no
16 Minneapolis MN no
17 San Diego CA no
18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
19 Tampa FL yes
20 St. Louis MO no

Like I said they were in a few major markets albeit briefly because they would not get good ratings. They had good ratings in outlying cities in about 10 markets or so.

Facts are facts.

Just my 2 cents.

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks to David M for actually having the decency
> and BALLS to engage in a conversation here.


+1 Nice work David. I used to spend time on the TMOS site before it was closed and was constantly amazed at the Scientology-like climate. You did stand out however with your ability to walk the tight rope between covert criticism and falling to your death. I think you are one clever dude but also sincere. Carry on.

peekza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LoLoscar is right...you're just backpedaling
> now...


Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms and never heard of them until I got transferred to Quantico. Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never heard of them.

DC area transplants would know to search them out. Other than really Howard Stern, I had never heard talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M might have been nationally syndicated, but not in major markets until late 90's around the the time I heard them the first time.

Just my 2 cents.

hahahahahahaha Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> From our friend Will on the TMOS Page. Noticed we
> are mentioned.
>
> Also notice he is threatening gestapo action.
>
> So he spouts hate towards us, then threatens
> everyone for spouting hate.
>
>
> -


Will Johnson truly is a Nazi...He wants to control people's thoughts,all passive pussy style...Guys, I'm not saying I'll block you...but I will vaguely reference blocking/deleting you...How ironic that they're worried about turning into US?

Dons black berry said:

1 New York NY yes briefly
2 Los Angeles CA no
3 Chicago IL no
4 San Francisco CA no
5 Dallas TX no
6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
8 Washington DC yes
9 Atlanta GA no
10 Detroit MI no
11 Boston MA no
12 Miami FL no
13 Puerto Rico PR no
14 Seattle WA no
15 Phoenix AZ no
16 Minneapolis MN no
17 San Diego CA no
18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
19 Tampa FL yes
20 St. Louis MO no

NY yes
LA NO
Chi Yes
Phi Yes
SF Yes
Dallas Yes
Houston Yes
Philly Yes
DC Yes
Atl No
Detroit Yes

Google that you asshole. Not saying D&M killed, but they had the clears. Many times same as Stern or O&A. So google your Mom's Box you Omeara defending Junkie Loving CUNT

GOOGLE OR WIKI DONS RESUME, BEFORE HE KNEW MIKE:

NEW YORK CITY 99X
LOS ANGELES KIIS KFI
CHICAGO WLS WBBM
DETROIT WDRQ
PITTSBURGH 13Q
WASHINGTON DC WPGC

THAT"S AS GOOD AS YOU GET MAJOR MARKET, asswipe jr mike ass washer

Actually, they were on in Chicago, Detroit, Seattle, and a certain WHAN, broadcasting to...

Richmond?

please stop defending me, you r making me look even more pathetic

D&M were on 102.7 WNEW more than one year, more like two. Til it all blew up w Sex 4 Sam and O&A. Hell, regular listeners remember both Don and Mike getting apartments in NYC.

Who the fuck is getting this bogus info about them? is it that one "my 2 cents" douche?

why are they so threatened by Don G? If they like thei rhos with fearless leader and they get it for "free" whatz the problem?
Methinks they know that a large percent of Mike's audience and their $$$ will go to Don who at least will put out a decent product he gives a shit about.
Thoughts?

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------


> > > > there). I could go through the list of
> their
> > > > syndications and show that you're wrong,
> but
> > > it's
> > > > pointless. You'll just point to them never
> > > being
> > > > syndicated in LA as proof that no one knows
> > > them.
> > > > Keep up the good work skippy. You have yet
> to
> > > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > > mis-information.
> > > > Or Miss Information, if you will. I will!
> > Wocka
> > > > wocka.
> > >
> > >
> > > Not really sure how you heard them in Canada,
>
> > > maybe from Buffalo. At the most they had 26
> > > affiliates. New York was a disaster and
> lasted
> > > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were never
> > in
> > > major markets. Facts are facts. Google it.
> Name
> > > another major market, Skippy?
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > You are arguing over semantics now. What makes
> a
> > market major? This is your opinion so anything
> I
> > say you can come back with "that's not major".
> > Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn good. And I
> > think it was more than that since Toronto isn't
> on
> > the list but they were absolutely syndicated
> there
> > for a while. I remember them discussing their
> new
> > canadian syndication and they did a little bit
> > about Canada.
> >
> > Your point was they are not known outside of
> DC.
> > Well, not known outside of DC, Virginia,
> Maryland,
> > Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York, etc etc.
> > you also have to take into account all the
> > surrounding areas that still got the signal
> (ie.
> > me listening in Texas when I don't think they
> had
> > a syndication there). You made a statement that
> > wasn't correct. They absolutely were in some
> major
> > markets. Just because they weren't in every top
> 10
> > market doesn't mean they aren't known outside
> of
> > DC. That's simply not true and no amount of you
> > trying to talk your way out will change that.
> They
> > were never Stern, but they had a pretty large
> > following all across the map.
>
> TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
>
> 1 New York NY yes briefly
> 2 Los Angeles CA no
> 3 Chicago IL no
> 4 San Francisco CA no
> 5 Dallas TX no
> 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> 8 Washington DC yes
> 9 Atlanta GA no
> 10 Detroit MI no
> 11 Boston MA no
> 12 Miami FL no
> 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> 14 Seattle WA no
> 15 Phoenix AZ no
> 16 Minneapolis MN no
> 17 San Diego CA no
> 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> 19 Tampa FL yes
> 20 St. Louis MO no
>
> Like I said they were in a few major markets
> albeit briefly because they would not get good
> ratings. They had good ratings in outlying cities
> in about 10 markets or so.
>
> Facts are facts.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

I'm not arguing with you if they were in top 20 markets!! Jesus fucking Christ. You said they weren't known outside of DC and Sacramento. I said you're wrong. Now you're somehow turning this into them being in top 20 markets. Also, as others have pointed out, your list is incorrect, not that it matters because that's not what I'm talking to you about. I didn't know that you had to be a fixture in the top 20 markets to be known outside of DC and Sacramento. I guess if a radio show is syndicated in markets 21-100, that means they aren't well-known.

So please. Get on point. You says they aren't known outside if DC and Sacramento and your proof was that you lived in Richmond and hadn't heard of them. So that's WRONG. Please back up that statement and not this top 20 bullshit that you've back-peddled to.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> peekza Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LoLoscar is right...you're just backpedaling
> > now...
>
>
> Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms and never
> heard of them until I got transferred to Quantico.
> Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never heard of
> them.
>
> DC area transplants would know to search them out.
> Other than really Howard Stern, I had never heard
> talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M might have
> been nationally syndicated, but not in major
> markets until late 90's around the the time I
> heard them the first time.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

The fact that you were/are in the military is genuinely terrifying.

Fuck. I just realized I said "you says.." And sounded like a moron. I really need to register so I can edit.

peekza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh I forgot, I guess Wichita and Iowa were huge.
> I
> > would put the Sports Junkies as being more well
> > known at this point than Don and Mike in their
> > prime. Quite frankly a better show with
> longevity
> > top to bottom as well. They have staying power
> in
> > any format.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
>
> Are you fucking kidding me? The Junkies? A better
> show? Mike ranting in a shit stained studio is
> better than their "hurting" asses...Cakes an d EB
> are bearable, but I would rather listen to MandL
> than listen to JP or Lurch...

The Junkies are what they were; four guys talking over each other. I can't really listen to it. The level of ignorance is way too high. I remember when Warren Zevon died, they had no idea who he was.

shut the fuck up Dons BB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons black berry said:
>
> 1 New York NY yes briefly
> 2 Los Angeles CA no
> 3 Chicago IL no
> 4 San Francisco CA no
> 5 Dallas TX no
> 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> 8 Washington DC yes
> 9 Atlanta GA no
> 10 Detroit MI no
> 11 Boston MA no
> 12 Miami FL no
> 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> 14 Seattle WA no
> 15 Phoenix AZ no
> 16 Minneapolis MN no
> 17 San Diego CA no
> 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> 19 Tampa FL yes
> 20 St. Louis MO no
>
> NY yes
> LA NO
> Chi Yes
> Phi Yes
> SF Yes
> Dallas Yes
> Houston Yes
> Philly Yes
> DC Yes
> Atl No
> Detroit Yes
>
> Google that you asshole. Not saying D&M killed,
> but they had the clears. Many times same as Stern
> or O&A. So google your Mom's Box you Omeara
> defending Junkie Loving CUNT

You are wrong you name calling child. They were not in those markets and never had the ratings as Stern. Keep reinventing history. Does using bad words and attacking one's mother make you feel manly? Maybe if you eat your veges tonight mom will give you a Jello pudding cup for dessert. Have a great day!

Just my 2 cents.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 05:36AM by Dons BlackBerry.

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
>
> > > > > there). I could go through the list of
> > their
> > > > > syndications and show that you're wrong,
> > but
> > > > it's
> > > > > pointless. You'll just point to them
> never
> > > > being
> > > > > syndicated in LA as proof that no one
> knows
> > > > them.
> > > > > Keep up the good work skippy. You have
> yet
> > to
> > > > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > > > mis-information.
> > > > > Or Miss Information, if you will. I will!
> > > Wocka
> > > > > wocka.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not really sure how you heard them in
> Canada,
> >
> > > > maybe from Buffalo. At the most they had 26
> > > > affiliates. New York was a disaster and
> > lasted
> > > > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were
> never
> > > in
> > > > major markets. Facts are facts. Google it.
> > Name
> > > > another major market, Skippy?
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > You are arguing over semantics now. What
> makes
> > a
> > > market major? This is your opinion so
> anything
> > I
> > > say you can come back with "that's not
> major".
> > > Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn good. And
> I
> > > think it was more than that since Toronto
> isn't
> > on
> > > the list but they were absolutely syndicated
> > there
> > > for a while. I remember them discussing their
> > new
> > > canadian syndication and they did a little
> bit
> > > about Canada.
> > >
> > > Your point was they are not known outside of
> > DC.
> > > Well, not known outside of DC, Virginia,
> > Maryland,
> > > Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York, etc
> etc.
> > > you also have to take into account all the
> > > surrounding areas that still got the signal
> > (ie.
> > > me listening in Texas when I don't think they
> > had
> > > a syndication there). You made a statement
> that
> > > wasn't correct. They absolutely were in some
> > major
> > > markets. Just because they weren't in every
> top
> > 10
> > > market doesn't mean they aren't known outside
> > of
> > > DC. That's simply not true and no amount of
> you
> > > trying to talk your way out will change that.
> > They
> > > were never Stern, but they had a pretty large
> > > following all across the map.
> >
> > TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
> >
> > 1 New York NY yes briefly
> > 2 Los Angeles CA no
> > 3 Chicago IL no
> > 4 San Francisco CA no
> > 5 Dallas TX no
> > 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> > 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> > 8 Washington DC yes
> > 9 Atlanta GA no
> > 10 Detroit MI no
> > 11 Boston MA no
> > 12 Miami FL no
> > 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> > 14 Seattle WA no
> > 15 Phoenix AZ no
> > 16 Minneapolis MN no
> > 17 San Diego CA no
> > 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> > 19 Tampa FL yes
> > 20 St. Louis MO no
> >
> > Like I said they were in a few major markets
> > albeit briefly because they would not get good
> > ratings. They had good ratings in outlying
> cities
> > in about 10 markets or so.
> >
> > Facts are facts.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> I'm not arguing with you if they were in top 20
> markets!! Jesus fucking Christ. You said they
> weren't known outside of DC and Sacramento. I said
> you're wrong. Now you're somehow turning this into
> them being in top 20 markets. Also, as others have
> pointed out, your list is incorrect, not that it
> matters because that's not what I'm talking to you
> about. I didn't know that you had to be a fixture
> in the top 20 markets to be known outside of DC
> and Sacramento. I guess if a radio show is
> syndicated in markets 21-100, that means they
> aren't well-known.
>
> So please. Get on point. You says they aren't
> known outside if DC and Sacramento and your proof
> was that you lived in Richmond and hadn't heard of
> them. So that's WRONG. Please back up that
> statement and not this top 20 bullshit that you've
> back-peddled to.


I am not back pedalling. I am stating facts as I see them. You are stating just opinion. If I use your logic then theoretically I would have known them. I did not. Opinion is not fact.

Just my 2 cents.

Mom meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > peekza Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > LoLoscar is right...you're just backpedaling
> > > now...
> >
> >
> > Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms and
> never
> > heard of them until I got transferred to
> Quantico.
> > Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never heard of
> > them.
> >
> > DC area transplants would know to search them
> out.
> > Other than really Howard Stern, I had never
> heard
> > talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M might
> have
> > been nationally syndicated, but not in major
> > markets until late 90's around the the time I
> > heard them the first time.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> The fact that you were/are in the military is
> genuinely terrifying.

I forgot when one says something on this thread that you all disagree then the attacking begins. This is same tactics you all take with Mike O'Meara. It's terrifying because you were not man/ woman enough to serve your country. Why would you? You would not have enough time to hate on a comment board. That's the terrifying take away.

Just my 2 cents.

American Tourister Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> peekza Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Oh I forgot, I guess Wichita and Iowa were
> huge.
> > I
> > > would put the Sports Junkies as being more
> well
> > > known at this point than Don and Mike in
> their
> > > prime. Quite frankly a better show with
> > longevity
> > > top to bottom as well. They have staying
> power
> > in
> > > any format.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> >
> > Are you fucking kidding me? The Junkies? A
> better
> > show? Mike ranting in a shit stained studio is
> > better than their "hurting" asses...Cakes an d
> EB
> > are bearable, but I would rather listen to
> MandL
> > than listen to JP or Lurch...
>
> The Junkies are what they were; four guys talking
> over each other. I can't really listen to it.
> The level of ignorance is way too high. I
> remember when Warren Zevon died, they had no idea
> who he was.

Why would they know how he is? He was popular in the late 70's. Hell I have never heard of him until I google'ed him. They were born in 70 and they were kids when he was popular. Not to mention they did not listen to that type of music. Hell that would have been something my parents listened to. It's hard not to talk over when you have a 4 person tandem no matter how hard you try.

Just my 2 cents.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mom meh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > peekza Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> backpedaling
> > > > now...
> > >
> > >
> > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms and
> > never
> > > heard of them until I got transferred to
> > Quantico.
> > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never heard
> of
> > > them.
> > >
> > > DC area transplants would know to search them
> > out.
> > > Other than really Howard Stern, I had never
> > heard
> > > talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M might
> > have
> > > been nationally syndicated, but not in major
> > > markets until late 90's around the the time I
> > > heard them the first time.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > The fact that you were/are in the military is
> > genuinely terrifying.
>
> I forgot when one says something on this thread
> that you all disagree then the attacking begins.
> This is same tactics you all take with Mike
> O'Meara. It's terrifying because you were not man/
> woman enough to serve your country. Why would you?
> You would not have enough time to hate on a
> comment board. That's the terrifying take away.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

Did you seriously just criticize someone by saying they aren't "man enough to serve their country"? Seriously dude, you're a fucking horrible human being. And also, thanks for assuming I have no military experience. But that's what you do right? Assume and criticize. I can't even begin to describe how much you disgust me.

D&M NYC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> D&M were on 102.7 WNEW more than one year, more
> like two. Til it all blew up w Sex 4 Sam and O&A.
> Hell, regular listeners remember both Don and Mike
> getting apartments in NYC.
>
> Who the fuck is getting this bogus info about
> them? is it that one "my 2 cents" douche?

Not even close. I said briefly like 6 months. They were on about a year and suspended a couple of times for feuding with OandA. They had at best ranked 27th in the ratings. Stop reinventing history.

Just my 2 cents.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOLscar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> >
> > > > > > there). I could go through the list of
> > > their
> > > > > > syndications and show that you're
> wrong,
> > > but
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > pointless. You'll just point to them
> > never
> > > > > being
> > > > > > syndicated in LA as proof that no one
> > knows
> > > > > them.
> > > > > > Keep up the good work skippy. You have
> > yet
> > > to
> > > > > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > > > > mis-information.
> > > > > > Or Miss Information, if you will. I
> will!
> > > > Wocka
> > > > > > wocka.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Not really sure how you heard them in
> > Canada,
> > >
> > > > > maybe from Buffalo. At the most they had
> 26
> > > > > affiliates. New York was a disaster and
> > > lasted
> > > > > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were
> > never
> > > > in
> > > > > major markets. Facts are facts. Google
> it.
> > > Name
> > > > > another major market, Skippy?
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > You are arguing over semantics now. What
> > makes
> > > a
> > > > market major? This is your opinion so
> > anything
> > > I
> > > > say you can come back with "that's not
> > major".
> > > > Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn good.
> And
> > I
> > > > think it was more than that since Toronto
> > isn't
> > > on
> > > > the list but they were absolutely
> syndicated
> > > there
> > > > for a while. I remember them discussing
> their
> > > new
> > > > canadian syndication and they did a little
> > bit
> > > > about Canada.
> > > >
> > > > Your point was they are not known outside
> of
> > > DC.
> > > > Well, not known outside of DC, Virginia,
> > > Maryland,
> > > > Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York, etc
> > etc.
> > > > you also have to take into account all the
> > > > surrounding areas that still got the signal
> > > (ie.
> > > > me listening in Texas when I don't think
> they
> > > had
> > > > a syndication there). You made a statement
> > that
> > > > wasn't correct. They absolutely were in
> some
> > > major
> > > > markets. Just because they weren't in every
> > top
> > > 10
> > > > market doesn't mean they aren't known
> outside
> > > of
> > > > DC. That's simply not true and no amount of
> > you
> > > > trying to talk your way out will change
> that.
> > > They
> > > > were never Stern, but they had a pretty
> large
> > > > following all across the map.
> > >
> > > TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
> > >
> > > 1 New York NY yes briefly
> > > 2 Los Angeles CA no
> > > 3 Chicago IL no
> > > 4 San Francisco CA no
> > > 5 Dallas TX no
> > > 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> > > 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> > > 8 Washington DC yes
> > > 9 Atlanta GA no
> > > 10 Detroit MI no
> > > 11 Boston MA no
> > > 12 Miami FL no
> > > 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> > > 14 Seattle WA no
> > > 15 Phoenix AZ no
> > > 16 Minneapolis MN no
> > > 17 San Diego CA no
> > > 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> > > 19 Tampa FL yes
> > > 20 St. Louis MO no
> > >
> > > Like I said they were in a few major markets
> > > albeit briefly because they would not get
> good
> > > ratings. They had good ratings in outlying
> > cities
> > > in about 10 markets or so.
> > >
> > > Facts are facts.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > I'm not arguing with you if they were in top 20
> > markets!! Jesus fucking Christ. You said they
> > weren't known outside of DC and Sacramento. I
> said
> > you're wrong. Now you're somehow turning this
> into
> > them being in top 20 markets. Also, as others
> have
> > pointed out, your list is incorrect, not that
> it
> > matters because that's not what I'm talking to
> you
> > about. I didn't know that you had to be a
> fixture
> > in the top 20 markets to be known outside of DC
> > and Sacramento. I guess if a radio show is
> > syndicated in markets 21-100, that means they
> > aren't well-known.
> >
> > So please. Get on point. You says they aren't
> > known outside if DC and Sacramento and your
> proof
> > was that you lived in Richmond and hadn't heard
> of
> > them. So that's WRONG. Please back up that
> > statement and not this top 20 bullshit that
> you've
> > back-peddled to.
>
>
> I am not back pedalling. I am stating facts as I
> see them. You are stating just opinion. If I use
> your logic then theoretically I would have known
> them. I did not. Opinion is not fact.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

So let me get this straight. You saying you hadn't heard of D and M when you lived in Richmond is proof that they weren't well-known outside of DC = FACT.

Me saying they were syndicated in over 26 markets and, from first-hand experience, were known in every market I've been in = opinion.

"If I use your logic then then theoretically I would have known them. I did not". Uhhhh. What? You really come off like you have a border-line forest gump level IQ. You're worse though. At least Gump knew he wasn't smart. You seem like you actually think you have the ability to debate people on here. Let me break it to you. You can barely string two sentences together. You aren't bright enough to debate people here.

Mom meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Mom meh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > peekza Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> > backpedaling
> > > > > now...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms and
> > > never
> > > > heard of them until I got transferred to
> > > Quantico.
> > > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never heard
> > of
> > > > them.
> > > >
> > > > DC area transplants would know to search
> them
> > > out.
> > > > Other than really Howard Stern, I had never
> > > heard
> > > > talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M
> might
> > > have
> > > > been nationally syndicated, but not in
> major
> > > > markets until late 90's around the the time
> I
> > > > heard them the first time.
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > The fact that you were/are in the military is
> > > genuinely terrifying.
> >
> > I forgot when one says something on this thread
> > that you all disagree then the attacking
> begins.
> > This is same tactics you all take with Mike
> > O'Meara. It's terrifying because you were not
> man/
> > woman enough to serve your country. Why would
> you?
> > You would not have enough time to hate on a
> > comment board. That's the terrifying take away.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> Did you seriously just criticize someone by saying
> they aren't "man enough to serve their country"?
> Seriously dude, you're a fucking horrible human
> being. And also, thanks for assuming I have no
> military experience. But that's what you do right?
> Assume and criticize. I can't even begin to
> describe how much you disgust me.

You are the one that started with the criticism of my service. Usually that's done by those that never served. So, don't cast out criticism without thinking the person would not take it as an insult. Why disgusted, because someone defending themselves?

Just my 2 cents.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> D&M NYC Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > D&M were on 102.7 WNEW more than one year, more
> > like two. Til it all blew up w Sex 4 Sam and
> O&A.
> > Hell, regular listeners remember both Don and
> Mike
> > getting apartments in NYC.
> >
> > Who the fuck is getting this bogus info about
> > them? is it that one "my 2 cents" douche?
>
> Not even close. I said briefly like 6 months. They
> were on about a year and suspended a couple of
> times for feuding with OandA. They had at best
> ranked 27th in the ratings. Stop reinventing
> history.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

Again, Mr Gump, the point isn't how long they were on. You said they aren't known outside of DC. You keep arguing bullshit that doesn't matter while ignoring your first moronic statement that they weren't known outside of DC. Are you really this dumb or are you doing a bit. I honestly don't know.

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOLscar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > > there). I could go through the list
> of
> > > > their
> > > > > > > syndications and show that you're
> > wrong,
> > > > but
> > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > pointless. You'll just point to them
> > > never
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > > syndicated in LA as proof that no one
> > > knows
> > > > > > them.
> > > > > > > Keep up the good work skippy. You
> have
> > > yet
> > > > to
> > > > > > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > > > > > mis-information.
> > > > > > > Or Miss Information, if you will. I
> > will!
> > > > > Wocka
> > > > > > > wocka.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not really sure how you heard them in
> > > Canada,
> > > >
> > > > > > maybe from Buffalo. At the most they
> had
> > 26
> > > > > > affiliates. New York was a disaster and
> > > > lasted
> > > > > > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they were
> > > never
> > > > > in
> > > > > > major markets. Facts are facts. Google
> > it.
> > > > Name
> > > > > > another major market, Skippy?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > >
> > > > > You are arguing over semantics now. What
> > > makes
> > > > a
> > > > > market major? This is your opinion so
> > > anything
> > > > I
> > > > > say you can come back with "that's not
> > > major".
> > > > > Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn good.
> > And
> > > I
> > > > > think it was more than that since Toronto
> > > isn't
> > > > on
> > > > > the list but they were absolutely
> > syndicated
> > > > there
> > > > > for a while. I remember them discussing
> > their
> > > > new
> > > > > canadian syndication and they did a
> little
> > > bit
> > > > > about Canada.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your point was they are not known outside
> > of
> > > > DC.
> > > > > Well, not known outside of DC, Virginia,
> > > > Maryland,
> > > > > Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York,
> etc
> > > etc.
> > > > > you also have to take into account all
> the
> > > > > surrounding areas that still got the
> signal
> > > > (ie.
> > > > > me listening in Texas when I don't think
> > they
> > > > had
> > > > > a syndication there). You made a
> statement
> > > that
> > > > > wasn't correct. They absolutely were in
> > some
> > > > major
> > > > > markets. Just because they weren't in
> every
> > > top
> > > > 10
> > > > > market doesn't mean they aren't known
> > outside
> > > > of
> > > > > DC. That's simply not true and no amount
> of
> > > you
> > > > > trying to talk your way out will change
> > that.
> > > > They
> > > > > were never Stern, but they had a pretty
> > large
> > > > > following all across the map.
> > > >
> > > > TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
> > > >
> > > > 1 New York NY yes briefly
> > > > 2 Los Angeles CA no
> > > > 3 Chicago IL no
> > > > 4 San Francisco CA no
> > > > 5 Dallas TX no
> > > > 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> > > > 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> > > > 8 Washington DC yes
> > > > 9 Atlanta GA no
> > > > 10 Detroit MI no
> > > > 11 Boston MA no
> > > > 12 Miami FL no
> > > > 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> > > > 14 Seattle WA no
> > > > 15 Phoenix AZ no
> > > > 16 Minneapolis MN no
> > > > 17 San Diego CA no
> > > > 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> > > > 19 Tampa FL yes
> > > > 20 St. Louis MO no
> > > >
> > > > Like I said they were in a few major
> markets
> > > > albeit briefly because they would not get
> > good
> > > > ratings. They had good ratings in outlying
> > > cities
> > > > in about 10 markets or so.
> > > >
> > > > Facts are facts.
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > I'm not arguing with you if they were in top
> 20
> > > markets!! Jesus fucking Christ. You said they
> > > weren't known outside of DC and Sacramento. I
> > said
> > > you're wrong. Now you're somehow turning this
> > into
> > > them being in top 20 markets. Also, as others
> > have
> > > pointed out, your list is incorrect, not that
> > it
> > > matters because that's not what I'm talking
> to
> > you
> > > about. I didn't know that you had to be a
> > fixture
> > > in the top 20 markets to be known outside of
> DC
> > > and Sacramento. I guess if a radio show is
> > > syndicated in markets 21-100, that means they
> > > aren't well-known.
> > >
> > > So please. Get on point. You says they aren't
> > > known outside if DC and Sacramento and your
> > proof
> > > was that you lived in Richmond and hadn't
> heard
> > of
> > > them. So that's WRONG. Please back up that
> > > statement and not this top 20 bullshit that
> > you've
> > > back-peddled to.
> >
> >
> > I am not back pedalling. I am stating facts as
> I
> > see them. You are stating just opinion. If I
> use
> > your logic then theoretically I would have
> known
> > them. I did not. Opinion is not fact.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> So let me get this straight. You saying you hadn't
> heard of D and M when you lived in Richmond is
> proof that they weren't well-known outside of DC =
> FACT.
>
> Me saying they were syndicated in over 26 markets
> and, from first-hand experience, were known in
> every market I've been in = opinion.
>
> "If I use your logic then then theoretically I
> would have known them. I did not". Uhhhh. What?
> You really come off like you have a border-line
> forest gump level IQ. You're worse though. At
> least Gump knew he wasn't smart. You seem like you
> actually think you have the ability to debate
> people on here. Let me break it to you. You can
> barely string two sentences together. You aren't
> bright enough to debate people here.

I from the point of my original post have said that they were not as well known as Stern or O&A. You stated they were. I used those 2 cities as examples of their most popular markets they were on. They may have been more well known after their brief stints in major markets. But by that point I had heard of them. I just don't agree that in the early 90's they were that well known outside of DC.

Just my 2 cents.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 06:10AM by Dons BlackBerry.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mom meh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > peekza Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> > > backpedaling
> > > > > > now...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms
> and
> > > > never
> > > > > heard of them until I got transferred to
> > > > Quantico.
> > > > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never
> heard
> > > of
> > > > > them.
> > > > >
> > > > > DC area transplants would know to search
> > them
> > > > out.
> > > > > Other than really Howard Stern, I had
> never
> > > > heard
> > > > > talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M
> > might
> > > > have
> > > > > been nationally syndicated, but not in
> > major
> > > > > markets until late 90's around the the
> time
> > I
> > > > > heard them the first time.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > The fact that you were/are in the military
> is
> > > > genuinely terrifying.
> > >
> > > I forgot when one says something on this
> thread
> > > that you all disagree then the attacking
> > begins.
> > > This is same tactics you all take with Mike
> > > O'Meara. It's terrifying because you were not
> > man/
> > > woman enough to serve your country. Why would
> > you?
> > > You would not have enough time to hate on a
> > > comment board. That's the terrifying take
> away.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > Did you seriously just criticize someone by
> saying
> > they aren't "man enough to serve their
> country"?
> > Seriously dude, you're a fucking horrible human
> > being. And also, thanks for assuming I have no
> > military experience. But that's what you do
> right?
> > Assume and criticize. I can't even begin to
> > describe how much you disgust me.
>
> You are the one that started with the criticism of
> my service. Usually that's done by those that
> never served. So, don't cast out criticism without
> thinking the person would not take it as an
> insult. Why disgusted, because someone defending
> themselves?
>
> Just my 2 cents.

I'm glad you took it as an insult because it was one. If you really wanted to defend your service you wouldn't have thrown a blanket statement out that anyone that doesn't serve their country isn't a real man/women. That tells me all I need to know about you. This is going to be the most honest thing I've ever typed here so read carefully ... Fuck you.

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > D&M NYC Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > D&M were on 102.7 WNEW more than one year,
> more
> > > like two. Til it all blew up w Sex 4 Sam and
> > O&A.
> > > Hell, regular listeners remember both Don and
> > Mike
> > > getting apartments in NYC.
> > >
> > > Who the fuck is getting this bogus info about
> > > them? is it that one "my 2 cents" douche?
> >
> > Not even close. I said briefly like 6 months.
> They
> > were on about a year and suspended a couple of
> > times for feuding with OandA. They had at best
> > ranked 27th in the ratings. Stop reinventing
> > history.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> Again, Mr Gump, the point isn't how long they were
> on. You said they aren't known outside of DC. You
> keep arguing bullshit that doesn't matter while
> ignoring your first moronic statement that they
> weren't known outside of DC. Are you really this
> dumb or are you doing a bit. I honestly don't
> know.

Let's be clear. They we not that well known outside of the DC market in the early 90's. How could they? They did not go into syndication until the mid to late 90's and the cities I spent time in they were not in. I did not here of them until I moved to DC.

Just my 2 cents.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 06:14AM by Dons BlackBerry.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOLscar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > LOLscar Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > there). I could go through the list
> > of
> > > > > their
> > > > > > > > syndications and show that you're
> > > wrong,
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > pointless. You'll just point to
> them
> > > > never
> > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > syndicated in LA as proof that no
> one
> > > > knows
> > > > > > > them.
> > > > > > > > Keep up the good work skippy. You
> > have
> > > > yet
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > > > > > > mis-information.
> > > > > > > > Or Miss Information, if you will. I
> > > will!
> > > > > > Wocka
> > > > > > > > wocka.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not really sure how you heard them in
> > > > Canada,
> > > > >
> > > > > > > maybe from Buffalo. At the most they
> > had
> > > 26
> > > > > > > affiliates. New York was a disaster
> and
> > > > > lasted
> > > > > > > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they
> were
> > > > never
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > major markets. Facts are facts.
> Google
> > > it.
> > > > > Name
> > > > > > > another major market, Skippy?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are arguing over semantics now.
> What
> > > > makes
> > > > > a
> > > > > > market major? This is your opinion so
> > > > anything
> > > > > I
> > > > > > say you can come back with "that's not
> > > > major".
> > > > > > Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn
> good.
> > > And
> > > > I
> > > > > > think it was more than that since
> Toronto
> > > > isn't
> > > > > on
> > > > > > the list but they were absolutely
> > > syndicated
> > > > > there
> > > > > > for a while. I remember them discussing
> > > their
> > > > > new
> > > > > > canadian syndication and they did a
> > little
> > > > bit
> > > > > > about Canada.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your point was they are not known
> outside
> > > of
> > > > > DC.
> > > > > > Well, not known outside of DC,
> Virginia,
> > > > > Maryland,
> > > > > > Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New York,
> > etc
> > > > etc.
> > > > > > you also have to take into account all
> > the
> > > > > > surrounding areas that still got the
> > signal
> > > > > (ie.
> > > > > > me listening in Texas when I don't
> think
> > > they
> > > > > had
> > > > > > a syndication there). You made a
> > statement
> > > > that
> > > > > > wasn't correct. They absolutely were in
> > > some
> > > > > major
> > > > > > markets. Just because they weren't in
> > every
> > > > top
> > > > > 10
> > > > > > market doesn't mean they aren't known
> > > outside
> > > > > of
> > > > > > DC. That's simply not true and no
> amount
> > of
> > > > you
> > > > > > trying to talk your way out will change
> > > that.
> > > > > They
> > > > > > were never Stern, but they had a pretty
> > > large
> > > > > > following all across the map.
> > > > >
> > > > > TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
> > > > >
> > > > > 1 New York NY yes briefly
> > > > > 2 Los Angeles CA no
> > > > > 3 Chicago IL no
> > > > > 4 San Francisco CA no
> > > > > 5 Dallas TX no
> > > > > 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> > > > > 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> > > > > 8 Washington DC yes
> > > > > 9 Atlanta GA no
> > > > > 10 Detroit MI no
> > > > > 11 Boston MA no
> > > > > 12 Miami FL no
> > > > > 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> > > > > 14 Seattle WA no
> > > > > 15 Phoenix AZ no
> > > > > 16 Minneapolis MN no
> > > > > 17 San Diego CA no
> > > > > 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> > > > > 19 Tampa FL yes
> > > > > 20 St. Louis MO no
> > > > >
> > > > > Like I said they were in a few major
> > markets
> > > > > albeit briefly because they would not get
> > > good
> > > > > ratings. They had good ratings in
> outlying
> > > > cities
> > > > > in about 10 markets or so.
> > > > >
> > > > > Facts are facts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not arguing with you if they were in
> top
> > 20
> > > > markets!! Jesus fucking Christ. You said
> they
> > > > weren't known outside of DC and Sacramento.
> I
> > > said
> > > > you're wrong. Now you're somehow turning
> this
> > > into
> > > > them being in top 20 markets. Also, as
> others
> > > have
> > > > pointed out, your list is incorrect, not
> that
> > > it
> > > > matters because that's not what I'm talking
> > to
> > > you
> > > > about. I didn't know that you had to be a
> > > fixture
> > > > in the top 20 markets to be known outside
> of
> > DC
> > > > and Sacramento. I guess if a radio show is
> > > > syndicated in markets 21-100, that means
> they
> > > > aren't well-known.
> > > >
> > > > So please. Get on point. You says they
> aren't
> > > > known outside if DC and Sacramento and your
> > > proof
> > > > was that you lived in Richmond and hadn't
> > heard
> > > of
> > > > them. So that's WRONG. Please back up that
> > > > statement and not this top 20 bullshit that
> > > you've
> > > > back-peddled to.
> > >
> > >
> > > I am not back pedalling. I am stating facts
> as
> > I
> > > see them. You are stating just opinion. If I
> > use
> > > your logic then theoretically I would have
> > known
> > > them. I did not. Opinion is not fact.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > So let me get this straight. You saying you
> hadn't
> > heard of D and M when you lived in Richmond is
> > proof that they weren't well-known outside of DC
> =
> > FACT.
> >
> > Me saying they were syndicated in over 26
> markets
> > and, from first-hand experience, were known in
> > every market I've been in = opinion.
> >
> > "If I use your logic then then theoretically I
> > would have known them. I did not". Uhhhh. What?
> > You really come off like you have a border-line
> > forest gump level IQ. You're worse though. At
> > least Gump knew he wasn't smart. You seem like
> you
> > actually think you have the ability to debate
> > people on here. Let me break it to you. You can
> > barely string two sentences together. You
> aren't
> > bright enough to debate people here.
>
> I from the point of my original post have said
> that they were not as well known as Stern or O&A.
> You stated they were. I used those 2 cities as
> examples of their most popular markets they were
> on. They may have been more well known after their
> brief stints in major markets. But by that point
> I had heard of them. I just don't agree that in
> the early 90's they were that well known outside
> of DC.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

I NEVER said they were as popular as Stern and no one else did either. In fact, I specifically pointed out that I don't think they were ever that popular. Again, your reading comprehension needs serious work. You said they weren't known outside of DC. I gave you first-hand experience showing that you're wrong. Somehow you took that as me saying they're as popular as Stern. I seriously can't believe that's what you got from my posts after specifically saying they aren't Stern or O and A level. Mind-blowing.

Mom meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Mom meh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > peekza Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> > > > backpedaling
> > > > > > > now...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29 Palms
> > and
> > > > > never
> > > > > > heard of them until I got transferred
> to
> > > > > Quantico.
> > > > > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never
> > heard
> > > > of
> > > > > > them.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DC area transplants would know to
> search
> > > them
> > > > > out.
> > > > > > Other than really Howard Stern, I had
> > never
> > > > > heard
> > > > > > talk radio until mid to late 90's. D&M
> > > might
> > > > > have
> > > > > > been nationally syndicated, but not in
> > > major
> > > > > > markets until late 90's around the the
> > time
> > > I
> > > > > > heard them the first time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > >
> > > > > The fact that you were/are in the
> military
> > is
> > > > > genuinely terrifying.
> > > >
> > > > I forgot when one says something on this
> > thread
> > > > that you all disagree then the attacking
> > > begins.
> > > > This is same tactics you all take with Mike
> > > > O'Meara. It's terrifying because you were
> not
> > > man/
> > > > woman enough to serve your country. Why
> would
> > > you?
> > > > You would not have enough time to hate on a
> > > > comment board. That's the terrifying take
> > away.
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > Did you seriously just criticize someone by
> > saying
> > > they aren't "man enough to serve their
> > country"?
> > > Seriously dude, you're a fucking horrible
> human
> > > being. And also, thanks for assuming I have
> no
> > > military experience. But that's what you do
> > right?
> > > Assume and criticize. I can't even begin to
> > > describe how much you disgust me.
> >
> > You are the one that started with the criticism
> of
> > my service. Usually that's done by those that
> > never served. So, don't cast out criticism
> without
> > thinking the person would not take it as an
> > insult. Why disgusted, because someone
> defending
> > themselves?
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> I'm glad you took it as an insult because it was
> one. If you really wanted to defend your service
> you wouldn't have thrown a blanket statement out
> that anyone that doesn't serve their country isn't
> a real man/women. That tells me all I need to know
> about you. This is going to be the most honest
> thing I've ever typed here so read carefully ...
> Fuck you.

It is an insult you idiot. I stand by my statement, if you are able bodied and don't serve your country then you are not a real man/ woman. So it proves my point, you never served. Typical liberal double standard Douchebag.

Just my 2 cents.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOLscar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > D&M NYC Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > D&M were on 102.7 WNEW more than one year,
> > more
> > > > like two. Til it all blew up w Sex 4 Sam
> and
> > > O&A.
> > > > Hell, regular listeners remember both Don
> and
> > > Mike
> > > > getting apartments in NYC.
> > > >
> > > > Who the fuck is getting this bogus info
> about
> > > > them? is it that one "my 2 cents" douche?
> > >
> > > Not even close. I said briefly like 6 months.
> > They
> > > were on about a year and suspended a couple
> of
> > > times for feuding with OandA. They had at
> best
> > > ranked 27th in the ratings. Stop reinventing
> > > history.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > Again, Mr Gump, the point isn't how long they
> were
> > on. You said they aren't known outside of DC.
> You
> > keep arguing bullshit that doesn't matter while
> > ignoring your first moronic statement that they
> > weren't known outside of DC. Are you really
> this
> > dumb or are you doing a bit. I honestly don't
> > know.
>
> Let's be clear. They we not that well known
> outside of the DC market in the early 90's. How
> could they? They did not go into syndication until
> the mid to late 90's and the cities I spent time
> in they were not in. I did not here of them until
> I moved to DC.
>
> Just my 2 cents.


So now you're changing the argument into they aren't popular outside of DC in the 90s? That wasn't your original point. But just keep twisting and editing your original point until it's not so stupid.

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOLscar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > LOLscar Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > there). I could go through the
> list
> > > of
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > syndications and show that you're
> > > > wrong,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > pointless. You'll just point to
> > them
> > > > > never
> > > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > syndicated in LA as proof that no
> > one
> > > > > knows
> > > > > > > > them.
> > > > > > > > > Keep up the good work skippy. You
> > > have
> > > > > yet
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > write a post that wasn't full of
> > > > > > > > mis-information.
> > > > > > > > > Or Miss Information, if you will.
> I
> > > > will!
> > > > > > > Wocka
> > > > > > > > > wocka.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Not really sure how you heard them
> in
> > > > > Canada,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > maybe from Buffalo. At the most
> they
> > > had
> > > > 26
> > > > > > > > affiliates. New York was a disaster
> > and
> > > > > > lasted
> > > > > > > > maybe 6 months. Other than DC they
> > were
> > > > > never
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > major markets. Facts are facts.
> > Google
> > > > it.
> > > > > > Name
> > > > > > > > another major market, Skippy?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You are arguing over semantics now.
> > What
> > > > > makes
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > market major? This is your opinion so
> > > > > anything
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > say you can come back with "that's
> not
> > > > > major".
> > > > > > > Having 26 affiliates is pretty damn
> > good.
> > > > And
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > think it was more than that since
> > Toronto
> > > > > isn't
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > the list but they were absolutely
> > > > syndicated
> > > > > > there
> > > > > > > for a while. I remember them
> discussing
> > > > their
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > canadian syndication and they did a
> > > little
> > > > > bit
> > > > > > > about Canada.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your point was they are not known
> > outside
> > > > of
> > > > > > DC.
> > > > > > > Well, not known outside of DC,
> > Virginia,
> > > > > > Maryland,
> > > > > > > Sacramento, Kansas, Toronto, New
> York,
> > > etc
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > you also have to take into account
> all
> > > the
> > > > > > > surrounding areas that still got the
> > > signal
> > > > > > (ie.
> > > > > > > me listening in Texas when I don't
> > think
> > > > they
> > > > > > had
> > > > > > > a syndication there). You made a
> > > statement
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > wasn't correct. They absolutely were
> in
> > > > some
> > > > > > major
> > > > > > > markets. Just because they weren't in
> > > every
> > > > > top
> > > > > > 10
> > > > > > > market doesn't mean they aren't known
> > > > outside
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > DC. That's simply not true and no
> > amount
> > > of
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > trying to talk your way out will
> change
> > > > that.
> > > > > > They
> > > > > > > were never Stern, but they had a
> pretty
> > > > large
> > > > > > > following all across the map.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1 New York NY yes briefly
> > > > > > 2 Los Angeles CA no
> > > > > > 3 Chicago IL no
> > > > > > 4 San Francisco CA no
> > > > > > 5 Dallas TX no
> > > > > > 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> > > > > > 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> > > > > > 8 Washington DC yes
> > > > > > 9 Atlanta GA no
> > > > > > 10 Detroit MI no
> > > > > > 11 Boston MA no
> > > > > > 12 Miami FL no
> > > > > > 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> > > > > > 14 Seattle WA no
> > > > > > 15 Phoenix AZ no
> > > > > > 16 Minneapolis MN no
> > > > > > 17 San Diego CA no
> > > > > > 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> > > > > > 19 Tampa FL yes
> > > > > > 20 St. Louis MO no
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like I said they were in a few major
> > > markets
> > > > > > albeit briefly because they would not
> get
> > > > good
> > > > > > ratings. They had good ratings in
> > outlying
> > > > > cities
> > > > > > in about 10 markets or so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Facts are facts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not arguing with you if they were in
> > top
> > > 20
> > > > > markets!! Jesus fucking Christ. You said
> > they
> > > > > weren't known outside of DC and
> Sacramento.
> > I
> > > > said
> > > > > you're wrong. Now you're somehow turning
> > this
> > > > into
> > > > > them being in top 20 markets. Also, as
> > others
> > > > have
> > > > > pointed out, your list is incorrect, not
> > that
> > > > it
> > > > > matters because that's not what I'm
> talking
> > > to
> > > > you
> > > > > about. I didn't know that you had to be a
> > > > fixture
> > > > > in the top 20 markets to be known outside
> > of
> > > DC
> > > > > and Sacramento. I guess if a radio show
> is
> > > > > syndicated in markets 21-100, that means
> > they
> > > > > aren't well-known.
> > > > >
> > > > > So please. Get on point. You says they
> > aren't
> > > > > known outside if DC and Sacramento and
> your
> > > > proof
> > > > > was that you lived in Richmond and hadn't
> > > heard
> > > > of
> > > > > them. So that's WRONG. Please back up
> that
> > > > > statement and not this top 20 bullshit
> that
> > > > you've
> > > > > back-peddled to.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am not back pedalling. I am stating facts
> > as
> > > I
> > > > see them. You are stating just opinion. If
> I
> > > use
> > > > your logic then theoretically I would have
> > > known
> > > > them. I did not. Opinion is not fact.
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > So let me get this straight. You saying you
> > hadn't
> > > heard of D and M when you lived in Richmond
> is
> > > proof that they weren't well-known outside of
> DC
> > =
> > > FACT.
> > >
> > > Me saying they were syndicated in over 26
> > markets
> > > and, from first-hand experience, were known
> in
> > > every market I've been in = opinion.
> > >
> > > "If I use your logic then then theoretically
> I
> > > would have known them. I did not". Uhhhh.
> What?
> > > You really come off like you have a
> border-line
> > > forest gump level IQ. You're worse though. At
> > > least Gump knew he wasn't smart. You seem
> like
> > you
> > > actually think you have the ability to debate
> > > people on here. Let me break it to you. You
> can
> > > barely string two sentences together. You
> > aren't
> > > bright enough to debate people here.
> >
> > I from the point of my original post have said
> > that they were not as well known as Stern or
> O&A.
> > You stated they were. I used those 2 cities as
> > examples of their most popular markets they
> were
> > on. They may have been more well known after
> their
> > brief stints in major markets. But by that
> point
> > I had heard of them. I just don't agree that in
> > the early 90's they were that well known
> outside
> > of DC.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> I NEVER said they were as popular as Stern and no
> one else did either. In fact, I specifically
> pointed out that I don't think they were ever that
> popular. Again, your reading comprehension needs
> serious work. You said they weren't known outside
> of DC. I gave you first-hand experience showing
> that you're wrong. Somehow you took that as me
> saying they're as popular as Stern. I seriously
> can't believe that's what you got from my posts
> after specifically saying they aren't Stern or O
> and A level. Mind-blowing.

Seriously, read your statement. You gave yourself as an example to prove your point. I gave you my first hand experience as an example, coupled with stats. I am the idiot because I won't take you first hand experience as the end all be all. Laughable.

Just my 2 cents.

LOLscar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOLscar Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > D&M NYC Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > D&M were on 102.7 WNEW more than one
> year,
> > > more
> > > > > like two. Til it all blew up w Sex 4 Sam
> > and
> > > > O&A.
> > > > > Hell, regular listeners remember both Don
> > and
> > > > Mike
> > > > > getting apartments in NYC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Who the fuck is getting this bogus info
> > about
> > > > > them? is it that one "my 2 cents" douche?
> > > >
> > > > Not even close. I said briefly like 6
> months.
> > > They
> > > > were on about a year and suspended a couple
> > of
> > > > times for feuding with OandA. They had at
> > best
> > > > ranked 27th in the ratings. Stop
> reinventing
> > > > history.
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > Again, Mr Gump, the point isn't how long they
> > were
> > > on. You said they aren't known outside of DC.
> > You
> > > keep arguing bullshit that doesn't matter
> while
> > > ignoring your first moronic statement that
> they
> > > weren't known outside of DC. Are you really
> > this
> > > dumb or are you doing a bit. I honestly don't
> > > know.
> >
> > Let's be clear. They we not that well known
> > outside of the DC market in the early 90's. How
> > could they? They did not go into syndication
> until
> > the mid to late 90's and the cities I spent
> time
> > in they were not in. I did not here of them
> until
> > I moved to DC.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
>
> So now you're changing the argument into they
> aren't popular outside of DC in the 90s? That
> wasn't your original point. But just keep twisting
> and editing your original point until it's not so
> stupid.

It's not twisting. It's clarification to my original post.

Just my 2 cents.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mom meh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > peekza Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> > > > > backpedaling
> > > > > > > > now...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29
> Palms
> > > and
> > > > > > never
> > > > > > > heard of them until I got transferred
> > to
> > > > > > Quantico.
> > > > > > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver, never
> > > heard
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > them.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > DC area transplants would know to
> > search
> > > > them
> > > > > > out.
> > > > > > > Other than really Howard Stern, I had
> > > never
> > > > > > heard
> > > > > > > talk radio until mid to late 90's.
> D&M
> > > > might
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > been nationally syndicated, but not
> in
> > > > major
> > > > > > > markets until late 90's around the
> the
> > > time
> > > > I
> > > > > > > heard them the first time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The fact that you were/are in the
> > military
> > > is
> > > > > > genuinely terrifying.
> > > > >
> > > > > I forgot when one says something on this
> > > thread
> > > > > that you all disagree then the attacking
> > > > begins.
> > > > > This is same tactics you all take with
> Mike
> > > > > O'Meara. It's terrifying because you were
> > not
> > > > man/
> > > > > woman enough to serve your country. Why
> > would
> > > > you?
> > > > > You would not have enough time to hate on
> a
> > > > > comment board. That's the terrifying take
> > > away.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > Did you seriously just criticize someone by
> > > saying
> > > > they aren't "man enough to serve their
> > > country"?
> > > > Seriously dude, you're a fucking horrible
> > human
> > > > being. And also, thanks for assuming I have
> > no
> > > > military experience. But that's what you do
> > > right?
> > > > Assume and criticize. I can't even begin to
> > > > describe how much you disgust me.
> > >
> > > You are the one that started with the
> criticism
> > of
> > > my service. Usually that's done by those that
> > > never served. So, don't cast out criticism
> > without
> > > thinking the person would not take it as an
> > > insult. Why disgusted, because someone
> > defending
> > > themselves?
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > I'm glad you took it as an insult because it
> was
> > one. If you really wanted to defend your
> service
> > you wouldn't have thrown a blanket statement
> out
> > that anyone that doesn't serve their country
> isn't
> > a real man/women. That tells me all I need to
> know
> > about you. This is going to be the most honest
> > thing I've ever typed here so read carefully
> ...
> > Fuck you.
>
> It is an insult you idiot. I stand by my
> statement, if you are able bodied and don't serve
> your country then you are not a real man/ woman.
> So it proves my point, you never served. Typical
> liberal double standard Douchebag.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

I said it was meant as an insult!! Fuck you're stupid! And thanks for elaborating on your point to show how horrible of a human being you are. I've worked my way up the ladder in the military and I know people like you. You are the type that never made a difference and didn't have the intelligence to go anywhere. To make up for these failures, you pump up your chest about your service and bitch about the "liberals that don't serve". I'm so happy I've moved up and don't have to deal with the 1% of military people that are like you.

My work here is done. I took heat off of TMOS. Now time to go listen to a real show, Opie and Anthony.

Have fun board of trolling tools.

Goodbye for ever.

Just my 2 cents.

Mom meh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Mom meh Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > peekza Wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> > > > > > backpedaling
> > > > > > > > > now...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29
> > Palms
> > > > and
> > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > heard of them until I got
> transferred
> > > to
> > > > > > > Quantico.
> > > > > > > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver,
> never
> > > > heard
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > them.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > DC area transplants would know to
> > > search
> > > > > them
> > > > > > > out.
> > > > > > > > Other than really Howard Stern, I
> had
> > > > never
> > > > > > > heard
> > > > > > > > talk radio until mid to late 90's.
> > D&M
> > > > > might
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > been nationally syndicated, but not
> > in
> > > > > major
> > > > > > > > markets until late 90's around the
> > the
> > > > time
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > > heard them the first time.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The fact that you were/are in the
> > > military
> > > > is
> > > > > > > genuinely terrifying.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I forgot when one says something on
> this
> > > > thread
> > > > > > that you all disagree then the
> attacking
> > > > > begins.
> > > > > > This is same tactics you all take with
> > Mike
> > > > > > O'Meara. It's terrifying because you
> were
> > > not
> > > > > man/
> > > > > > woman enough to serve your country. Why
> > > would
> > > > > you?
> > > > > > You would not have enough time to hate
> on
> > a
> > > > > > comment board. That's the terrifying
> take
> > > > away.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you seriously just criticize someone
> by
> > > > saying
> > > > > they aren't "man enough to serve their
> > > > country"?
> > > > > Seriously dude, you're a fucking horrible
> > > human
> > > > > being. And also, thanks for assuming I
> have
> > > no
> > > > > military experience. But that's what you
> do
> > > > right?
> > > > > Assume and criticize. I can't even begin
> to
> > > > > describe how much you disgust me.
> > > >
> > > > You are the one that started with the
> > criticism
> > > of
> > > > my service. Usually that's done by those
> that
> > > > never served. So, don't cast out criticism
> > > without
> > > > thinking the person would not take it as an
> > > > insult. Why disgusted, because someone
> > > defending
> > > > themselves?
> > > >
> > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > >
> > > I'm glad you took it as an insult because it
> > was
> > > one. If you really wanted to defend your
> > service
> > > you wouldn't have thrown a blanket statement
> > out
> > > that anyone that doesn't serve their country
> > isn't
> > > a real man/women. That tells me all I need to
> > know
> > > about you. This is going to be the most
> honest
> > > thing I've ever typed here so read carefully
> > ...
> > > Fuck you.
> >
> > It is an insult you idiot. I stand by my
> > statement, if you are able bodied and don't
> serve
> > your country then you are not a real man/ woman.
>
> > So it proves my point, you never served.
> Typical
> > liberal double standard Douchebag.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> I said it was meant as an insult!! Fuck you're
> stupid! And thanks for elaborating on your point
> to show how horrible of a human being you are.
> I've worked my way up the ladder in the military
> and I know people like you. You are the type that
> never made a difference and didn't have the
> intelligence to go anywhere. To make up for these
> failures, you pump up your chest about your
> service and bitch about the "liberals that don't
> serve". I'm so happy I've moved up and don't have
> to deal with the 1% of military people that are
> like you.


Again it shows your double standards. I did move on. Own a successful company and am college educated. Hence, the reason I enlisted to pay for my college and serve my country.

So go fuck yourself you little faggot.

Just my 2 cents.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My work here is done. I took heat off of TMOS. Now
> time to go listen to a real show, Opie and
> Anthony.
>
> Have fun board of trolling tools.
>
> Goodbye for ever.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

Yyyyeah. You didn't take heat off of anything. People still chastised TMOS while they also pointed out how you're a horrible person. How sad your life must be if this is a "win" for you.

Let's give Dons BB the day off. The back and forth has become more tedious than the birthday segment, which coincidentally is today, lucky listeners.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mom meh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Mom meh Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > > peekza Wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > > > LoLoscar is right...you're just
> > > > > > > backpedaling
> > > > > > > > > > now...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Not at all. I was stationed at 29
> > > Palms
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > heard of them until I got
> > transferred
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > Quantico.
> > > > > > > > > Grew up in Richmond and Denver,
> > never
> > > > > heard
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > them.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > DC area transplants would know to
> > > > search
> > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > out.
> > > > > > > > > Other than really Howard Stern, I
> > had
> > > > > never
> > > > > > > > heard
> > > > > > > > > talk radio until mid to late
> 90's.
> > > D&M
> > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > been nationally syndicated, but
> not
> > > in
> > > > > > major
> > > > > > > > > markets until late 90's around
> the
> > > the
> > > > > time
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > heard them the first time.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The fact that you were/are in the
> > > > military
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > genuinely terrifying.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I forgot when one says something on
> > this
> > > > > thread
> > > > > > > that you all disagree then the
> > attacking
> > > > > > begins.
> > > > > > > This is same tactics you all take
> with
> > > Mike
> > > > > > > O'Meara. It's terrifying because you
> > were
> > > > not
> > > > > > man/
> > > > > > > woman enough to serve your country.
> Why
> > > > would
> > > > > > you?
> > > > > > > You would not have enough time to
> hate
> > on
> > > a
> > > > > > > comment board. That's the terrifying
> > take
> > > > > away.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did you seriously just criticize
> someone
> > by
> > > > > saying
> > > > > > they aren't "man enough to serve their
> > > > > country"?
> > > > > > Seriously dude, you're a fucking
> horrible
> > > > human
> > > > > > being. And also, thanks for assuming I
> > have
> > > > no
> > > > > > military experience. But that's what
> you
> > do
> > > > > right?
> > > > > > Assume and criticize. I can't even
> begin
> > to
> > > > > > describe how much you disgust me.
> > > > >
> > > > > You are the one that started with the
> > > criticism
> > > > of
> > > > > my service. Usually that's done by those
> > that
> > > > > never served. So, don't cast out
> criticism
> > > > without
> > > > > thinking the person would not take it as
> an
> > > > > insult. Why disgusted, because someone
> > > > defending
> > > > > themselves?
> > > > >
> > > > > Just my 2 cents.
> > > >
> > > > I'm glad you took it as an insult because
> it
> > > was
> > > > one. If you really wanted to defend your
> > > service
> > > > you wouldn't have thrown a blanket
> statement
> > > out
> > > > that anyone that doesn't serve their
> country
> > > isn't
> > > > a real man/women. That tells me all I need
> to
> > > know
> > > > about you. This is going to be the most
> > honest
> > > > thing I've ever typed here so read
> carefully
> > > ...
> > > > Fuck you.
> > >
> > > It is an insult you idiot. I stand by my
> > > statement, if you are able bodied and don't
> > serve
> > > your country then you are not a real man/
> woman.
> >
> > > So it proves my point, you never served.
> > Typical
> > > liberal double standard Douchebag.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> > I said it was meant as an insult!! Fuck you're
> > stupid! And thanks for elaborating on your
> point
> > to show how horrible of a human being you are.
> > I've worked my way up the ladder in the
> military
> > and I know people like you. You are the type
> that
> > never made a difference and didn't have the
> > intelligence to go anywhere. To make up for
> these
> > failures, you pump up your chest about your
> > service and bitch about the "liberals that
> don't
> > serve". I'm so happy I've moved up and don't
> have
> > to deal with the 1% of military people that are
> > like you.
>
>
> Again it shows your double standards. I did move
> on. Own a successful company and am college
> educated. Hence, the reason I enlisted to pay for
> my college and serve my country.
>
> So go fuck yourself you little faggot.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

You are really something else. Did they teach you how to form a proper sentence in college? I would think they would've taught you that. Thanks for letting me know that I'm a liberal faggot. And thanks for playing right into my hands because this what the response I wanted from you. I had a feeling this was the type of person you are. So thanks for showing everyone here that you're a horrible, horrible person.

can't..

scroll...

any....

more.....

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:


>
> TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
>
> 1 New York NY yes briefly
> 2 Los Angeles CA no
> 3 Chicago IL no
> 4 San Francisco CA no
> 5 Dallas TX no
> 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> 8 Washington DC yes
> 9 Atlanta GA no
> 10 Detroit MI no
> 11 Boston MA no
> 12 Miami FL no
> 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> 14 Seattle WA no
> 15 Phoenix AZ no
> 16 Minneapolis MN no
> 17 San Diego CA no
> 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> 19 Tampa FL yes
> 20 St. Louis MO no
>
> Like I said they were in a few major markets
> albeit briefly because they would not get good
> ratings. They had good ratings in outlying cities
> in about 10 markets or so.
>
> Facts are facts.
>
> Just my 2 cents.

And your facts are wrong. They WERE on in Chicago. They WERE on in Detroit. They WERE on in Seattle.

And at their highest point, they had 62 affiliates, not 26. That's wishful thinking on your part.

Regardless of which markets they were on, they had, at least in the year 2000, over 6 million listeners at any given time, according to Arbitron.

Long Time Listener, First Time C Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
>
>
> >
> > TOP 20 RADIO MARKETS
> >
> > 1 New York NY yes briefly
> > 2 Los Angeles CA no
> > 3 Chicago IL no
> > 4 San Francisco CA no
> > 5 Dallas TX no
> > 6 Houston TX yes nights briefly
> > 7 Philadelphia PA yes briefly
> > 8 Washington DC yes
> > 9 Atlanta GA no
> > 10 Detroit MI no
> > 11 Boston MA no
> > 12 Miami FL no
> > 13 Puerto Rico PR no
> > 14 Seattle WA no
> > 15 Phoenix AZ no
> > 16 Minneapolis MN no
> > 17 San Diego CA no
> > 18 Nassau-Suffolk NY no
> > 19 Tampa FL yes
> > 20 St. Louis MO no
> >
> > Like I said they were in a few major markets
> > albeit briefly because they would not get good
> > ratings. They had good ratings in outlying
> cities
> > in about 10 markets or so.
> >
> > Facts are facts.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
>
> And your facts are wrong. They WERE on in Chicago.
> They WERE on in Detroit. They WERE on in Seattle.
>
>
> And at their highest point, they had 62
> affiliates, not 26. That's wishful thinking on
> your part.
>
> Regardless of which markets they were on, they
> had, at least in the year 2000, over 6 million
> listeners at any given time, according to
> Arbitron.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_and_Mike_Show

must be dyslexic.

Good points. Let's stop the silly name calling. Let's also stop the birthdays segment.

Intractable Insobriety Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let's give Dons BB the day off. The back and forth
> has become more tedious than the birthday segment,
> which coincidentally is today, lucky listeners.

Chill out with all the Junkies slander. They were a solid part of the Stern/D&M/O&A/R&F amazing content era.

who gives a fuck

GGORDON LIDDY WAS IN THE SAME BOAT regarding syndication and he sucked ass too

I can see I missed a war.

Dons BB is probably some TMOS Fan Club hump who's now celebrating in their walled garden jerking themselves off goin "WE GOT ONE OVER DEM BOYS".

Enjoy your dictatorship. That Will fellow is a douche.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I might like TMOS more if I didn't think I'd become a TMOS fan.

G. Gordon. Liddy's (and any conservative talk radio syndication, really) is a different animal than Don and Mike. Don and Mike were a dangerous (yes, for the 90s they were) drive time show that didn't just plug in a pre-made format and slot.

I always remember them having 50-something stations in the heyday (99-01?). Its impressive.

I wouldn't be surprised if Dons Blackberry IS Will.

Blobb Spewsack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wouldn't be surprised if Dons Blackberry IS
> Will.

I'm still getting over the inability of people, including DBB, to avoid quoting THE WHOLE MOTHERFUCKING PRIOR DISCUSSION.

Don's BlackBerry should join the Junkies. Then they can all sound like morons together.

American Tourister Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Blobb Spewsack Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I wouldn't be surprised if Dons Blackberry IS
> > Will.
>
> I'm still getting over the inability of people,
> including DBB, to avoid quoting THE WHOLE
> MOTHERFUCKING PRIOR DISCUSSION.


I just skip their post usually. Their post just gets lost in the noise. We don't need all that context.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I might like TMOS more if I didn't think I'd become a TMOS fan.

Finally, an argument I can scroll past. Since I missed almost a whole page I just have a couple things.
1. David's most recent big post here was very understandable. I hope he stays.
2. The post about Don watching his money reminded me about the other thing from MandL, Marc is no longer handling the money, Lowell is now, so apparently that was brought up during negotiations.
3 and most important. Peekza needs a new picture, maybe a special edition for the the race to Rob.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 10:10AM by bubbyman.

Where did the info about Marc stealing money from TMOS come from? I can't remember the origin. Was that mentioned by Mike on the podcast?

exffx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where did the info about Marc stealing money from
> TMOS come from? I can't remember the origin. Was
> that mentioned by Mike on the podcast?


I'm not really sure about stealing, but I remember numerous referrals to payment problems and not sending merchandise out all being Marc's fault.

Edit: This statement was based on hearsay.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 10:30AM by bubbyman.

It amazes me, the TMOS Fan Club page and this thread to a lesser extent had both been pretty slow, until Don showed up. This tells you something about their own Fan Club. Even they want something exciting. I read the rest of the comments on that post and Don has gotten them so excited that multiple posters were standing up to the guy that doesn't want to be the big bad moderator, but Will if he has to.
Attachments:

Yes, I'd like to add my thanks to David for the most reasonable discussion. I look forward to more. It's quite refreshing.

Bill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Not being a troll here...honestly asking...what
> subscription based podcasts do you listen to?
> Not talking about the occasional paid episodes
> like the ones you mention above...but real, full,
> subscription only podcasts?

None. What's your point?

I'm glad to see some pushback from the TMOS Fan Club sheep. Maybe all hope isn't lost yet.

Just a reminder, clubbers - if you get tired of their draconic rule, FFXU is always looking for good discussion!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I might like TMOS more if I didn't think I'd become a TMOS fan.

exffx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where did the info about Marc stealing money from
> TMOS come from? I can't remember the origin. Was
> that mentioned by Mike on the podcast?

I thought that grew out of the story of Marc "misplacing," then "finding" again, t-shirt or DVD money. Though that sounds like pretty standard adult ADHD rather than embezzlement (seriously-- like TMOS has any money to embezzle?).

I'm glad I'm not a part of that discussion group. I don't want to be a part of any discussion where I have to feel like I'd better walk on eggshells with everything I type. Life is too short.

Their way or the highway Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm glad I'm not a part of that discussion group.
> I don't want to be a part of any discussion where
> I have to feel like I'd better walk on eggshells
> with everything I type. Life is too short.


Yeah, I think a lot of them, as David pointed out, need the sense of belonging. A lot of club pages are like that, try going to a Mustang fan club and point out something bad about them.

Dons BlackBerry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My work here is done. I took heat off of TMOS. Now
> time to go listen to a real show, Opie and
> Anthony.
>
> Have fun board of trolling tools.
>
> Goodbye for ever.
>
> Just my 2 cents.


if only you meant it

bubbyman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2. The post about Don watching his money reminded
> me about the other thing from MandL, Marc is no
> longer handling the money, Lowell is now, so
> apparently that was brought up during
> negotiations.

Was this mentioned on the MandL show? Any reason given? I think the most serious financial accusations against Marc by LFF were his inability to ship merch on time/at all in some cases and the fact that he sat on the proceeds from one of the live shows for a few months before dispensing it to the Failkrewe.

Lowell actually has a real job, and doesn't live in his parent's basement (to be fair, I stopped listening to their show many months ago, so this might not be the current situation), unless Marc is utterly incompetent, wouldn't he have more time to handle the business side of things?

OK. For some reason I thought the Marc issue was something more serious like embezzling. Sounds like it was just a pothead who couldn't count or remember to do things.

This is a prime case of this forum running with something...somebody made a wild embezzlement allegation and eventually a few people ran with it.

OaktonWhineShop Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> exffx Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where did the info about Marc stealing money
> from
> > TMOS come from? I can't remember the origin.
> Was
> > that mentioned by Mike on the podcast?
>
> I thought that grew out of the story of Marc
> "misplacing," then "finding" again, t-shirt or DVD
> money. Though that sounds like pretty standard
> adult ADHD rather than embezzlement (seriously--
> like TMOS has any money to embezzle?).


HE had a side deal with Quench, Mike found out about it and fired him during an argument...

exffx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OK. For some reason I thought the Marc issue was
> something more serious like embezzling. Sounds
> like it was just a pothead who couldn't count or
> remember to do things.


Mike is the embezzler...He has liberated show $ many many times...

Four Hour Club Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Was this mentioned on the MandL show? Any reason
> given? I think the most serious financial
> accusations against Marc by LFF were his inability
> to ship merch on time/at all in some cases and the
> fact that he sat on the proceeds from one of the
> live shows for a few months before dispensing it
> to the Failkrewe.
>
> Lowell actually has a real job, and doesn't live
> in his parent's basement (to be fair, I stopped
> listening to their show many months ago, so this
> might not be the current situation), unless Marc
> is utterly incompetent, wouldn't he have more time
> to handle the business side of things?


It was during the conversation announcing Don was going to be on the network, just a minute or two about how Lowell is now going to be taking over as accountant for the network.
I had the same thought as you, but the real job aspect may be why it was part of the deal. Lowell's job most likely has a drug policy and pays enough that he has no incentive to steal.
Don's heard all the rumors we have so he's probably playing it safe, just because he smokes doesn't mean he wants the guy collecting his money to.

Update on the living situation: Marc lives with his girlfriend, but his parents still help him pay for auto repairs.

OaktonWhineShop Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Not being a troll here...honestly asking...what
> > subscription based podcasts do you listen to?
> > Not talking about the occasional paid episodes
> > like the ones you mention above...but real,
> full,
> > subscription only podcasts?
>
> None. What's your point?

I was looking for a successful subscription based podcast, and honestly hadn't heard of any. Someone else mentioned two from people I have barely heard of (not a radiophile) and Marc Maron, but I listen to Maron and don't have a subscription.

Bill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OaktonWhineShop Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bill Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Not being a troll here...honestly
> asking...what
> > > subscription based podcasts do you listen to?
> > > Not talking about the occasional paid
> episodes
> > > like the ones you mention above...but real,
> > full,
> > > subscription only podcasts?
> >
> > None. What's your point?
>
> I was looking for a successful subscription based
> podcast, and honestly hadn't heard of any.
> Someone else mentioned two from people I have
> barely heard of (not a radiophile) and Marc Maron,
> but I listen to Maron and don't have a
> subscription.

Bill, I am subscribing to one, other than that I don't really know of any. I think Maron does a subscription archive thing, I listen to it occasionally but haven't ever looked for an old episode.

Who knows, a year from now this may be like the discussions about the internet, color TV and FM radio. Or it might not.

I've been out of the loop for a while. What happened to Marc's marriage? And weren't Marc and Robb's daughters friends?

Never Not Funny was a successful subscription podcast, but they abandoned (or heavily modified, really) their model in order to grown their audience.

Bill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OaktonWhineShop Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bill Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Not being a troll here...honestly
> asking...what
> > > subscription based podcasts do you listen to?
> > > Not talking about the occasional paid
> episodes
> > > like the ones you mention above...but real,
> > full,
> > > subscription only podcasts?
> >
> > None. What's your point?
>
> I was looking for a successful subscription based
> podcast, and honestly hadn't heard of any.
> Someone else mentioned two from people I have
> barely heard of (not a radiophile) and Marc Maron,
> but I listen to Maron and don't have a
> subscription.

They got divorced around the time he left TMOS. I don't remember anything about them being/not being friends.

Bill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Didn't think so.
>
> Fuckheads.
>
> Mike O'Meara Rules!


Just couldn't help yourself could you? So now that someone responded to your original question I bet you feel a little silly about this don't you?

Iron Log Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Never Not Funny was a successful subscription
> podcast, but they abandoned (or heavily modified,
> really) their model in order to grown their
> audience.

I only question the successful part of this. They may have been doing well, but if they thought they were successful they wouldn't have changed. I'll have to check it out, I'm always looking for something new to listen to.

Yeah the main dude on Never Not Funny writes for Conan, and has for some time, so is presumably well compensated at his day gig. But they did state several times in their announcement show that it was about growing the show, and something to the effect that the freeish model would lose them money. They had been reluctant to change for that reason, but were convinced by an opportunity to grow the show.

I trust them bc they'be been super honest in the past. One of the cohosts left because the show was affecting his friendship with the main host, and they more or less hashed it out in a special episode. And remained friends. Sounds just like TMOS, huh?

I'll definitely look for it this afternoon. That is a totally different situation, If they aren't looking for money right now, just a bigger audience, it should work.
Did they do commercials during their paid only time?

My understanding is that they didn't do commercials on the paid show. But it does show that the paid model could work, financially. I don't remember them sharing audience numbers, but of course they could've in the past.

Usually I find more than 10 minutes of entertainment per week from TMOS, not so far this week.
Monday- Non-mentioned prerecorded show.
Tuesday- Guests!
Wednesday- A whole lot of nothing.
Thursday- Birthdays and Mike's bracket a day late.

Maybe they're saving the good stuff for Friday.

Iron Log Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> G. Gordon. Liddy's (and any conservative talk
> radio syndication, really) is a different animal
> than Don and Mike. Don and Mike were a dangerous
> (yes, for the 90s they were) drive time show that
> didn't just plug in a pre-made format and slot.
>
> I always remember them having 50-something
> stations in the heyday (99-01?). Its impressive.

Top shows in America include Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity. Their terrestrial ratings are as high as Howard Stern in his prime.

bubbyman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > OaktonWhineShop Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Bill Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > > Not being a troll here...honestly
> > asking...what
> > > > subscription based podcasts do you listen
> to?
> > > > Not talking about the occasional paid
> > episodes
> > > > like the ones you mention above...but real,
> > > full,
> > > > subscription only podcasts?
> > >
> > > None. What's your point?
> >
> > I was looking for a successful subscription
> based
> > podcast, and honestly hadn't heard of any.
> > Someone else mentioned two from people I have
> > barely heard of (not a radiophile) and Marc
> Maron,
> > but I listen to Maron and don't have a
> > subscription.
>
> Bill, I am subscribing to one, other than that I
> don't really know of any. I think Maron does a
> subscription archive thing, I listen to it
> occasionally but haven't ever looked for an old
> episode.
>
> Who knows, a year from now this may be like the
> discussions about the internet, color TV and FM
> radio. Or it might not.

They are all free, the app I used keeps them in a que until I listen to them. The M&L show is just awful, rather listen to a Robb laugh track.

Bill Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> I was looking for a successful subscription based
> podcast, and honestly hadn't heard of any.

My point wasn't that TMOS can't make a subscription model work because they're particularly bad, and that others could make it work because they're relatively better (yeah, I think that, but it wasn't my point). I think getting people to pay for a podcast in advance is a tough sell for most anyone. Especially since we've been conditioned to expect this form of entertainment for "free."

I still say you generally get what you pay for. Every now and then, a high quality show, app, or service will be available that really does seem free of significant up-front charge, but I believe these are the exceptions, not the norm. The paid experience for most things is just better over time-- by design.

When Don was back on JFK the co-host Kevin was a lot Robb with the constant suck up to Don. I hope the new show won't be the same. In fact every side kick he had in Sacramento was the same way. The chemistry is not there. With Mike it would be better with just Oscar. Mike is lazy but it's Robb that is dragging the show down.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 12:56PM by Sean Hannity.

Thanks, Bubbyman. I remember a few times that Robb and Marc's daughters were in the studio and comments were made about them doing things together. It would be a shame if their friendship became part of the collateral damage but it's hard to believe Mike would be ok with Robb maintaining a relationship with Marc.

I've noticed the same with BOAD. When the suck up to Chad started, I stopped listening. Fanboys are ruining the shows we all like.

Anyone hear BOAD's ReLoaded last night?
On the "free" show, Oscar plugged that they would discuss Don's podcasting venture...

Sean Hannity Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> They are all free, the app I used keeps them in a
> que until I listen to them. The M&L show is just
> awful, rather listen to a Robb laugh track.


Looked just now, mine does the same thing, but a new listener will have to pay to hear any episode before #433. Most of the podcasts I listen to are just background noise and I have a lot of road time to fill, I listen to MandL because it's an hour of noise and I get almost as much from listening to it as I do TMOS. At least TMOS gave us this thread for entertainment.

Steve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone hear BOAD's ReLoaded last night?
> On the "free" show, Oscar plugged that they would
> discuss Don's podcasting venture...


Not yet, but I will fix that this afternoon.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I might like TMOS more if I didn't think I'd become a TMOS fan.

Steve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anyone hear BOAD's ReLoaded last night?
> On the "free" show, Oscar plugged that they would
> discuss Don's podcasting venture...


I hadn't listened to either one yet, if he and Drab actually discuss it, they'll get a couple dollars from me. It'll probably be as much of a waste as the MandL premium I bought a couple weeks ago.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/20/2014 01:11PM by bubbyman.