Wow...
She's "ballsier" than I thought...
You'd think a New Editor for WAMU would know when to keep their mouths shut, at least.
--------
Re: Cindy - for Scott
Sharon Rae Pettigrew [rovernewsservices@yahoo.com]
Sent: Fri 8/10/2012 8:43 AM
To: Scott Lehman
***snort
Sent from my cute little pink iPhone
----
On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Scott Lehman wrote:
Cinthy and I talked about this for a bit…
Neither of us think that there’s any reason to think that you DO appreciate what you’ve done, or how it affected us. Did you know that Cinthy has nightmares, too?
Knowing what you now do, or should, you should understand what happened, why I believed I’d been illegally detained by order of the County, and how my Sister-in-Law continued her lies for two months while she watched things get worse.
You should also know that your activities in the community and online increased the level of anxiety in my house – you’ve even commented on your apparent success.
And to the last, you continued playing games with words – implying involvement by the Sxxxs and Bxxxs was pretty unforgiveable, really. You’ve been lying to those people for a while though, so I’m glad they got a little chance to see the real thing. How do you think they’ll feel in court, knowing that they’re testifying as witnesses just because your lies (assuming they were lies) put them in that position?
In your position, you have more need than most to understand the damage that you can cause. Let me know if something comes to mine that seems appropriate to you, but this offer is off. Personally, I can’t wait to see which strategy your lawyer chooses: the one where you claim that you antagonized the situation for a person who you believed to be unstable?
I do sincerely wish you the best in your recovery.
-S
Attachments: